Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23782998›Full record

ReviewLife sciences2013

Sphingosine lysolipids in the CNS: endogenous cannabinoid antagonists or a parallel pain modulatory system?

Dana E Selley, Sandra P Welch, Laura J Sim-Selley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Endocannabinoid signaling pathways: beyond CB1R and CB2R.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dana E SelleyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, United States. deselley@vcu.edu
Sandra P Welch
Laura J Sim-Selley
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Endocannabinoid modulation of pain-depressed behaviorR01DA030404 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEGUS, SIDNEY S, SIM-SELLEY, LAURA J · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
Brain Cannabinoid Signaling: Selectivity and AdaptationR01DA014277 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI SIM-SELLEY, LAURA J · 2002 to 2010
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS DA030404NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014277NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant number of patients experience chronic pain and the intractable side effects of currently prescribed pain medications. Recent evidence indicates important pain-modulatory roles for two classes of G-protein-coupled receptors that are activated by endogenous lipid ligands, the endocannabinoid (eCB) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors, which are widely expressed in both the immune and nervous systems. In the central nervous system (CNS), CB1 cannabinoid and S1P1 receptors are most abundantly expressed and exhibit overlapping anatomical distributions and similar signaling mechanisms. The eCB system has emerged as a potential target for treatment of chronic pain, but comparatively little is known about the roles of S1P in pain regulation. Both eCB and S1P systems modulate pain perception via the central and peripheral nervous systems. In most paradigms studied, the eCB system mainly inhibits pain perception. In contrast, S1P acting peripherally at S1P1 and S1P3 receptors can enhance sensitivity to various pain stimuli or elicit spontaneous pain. However, S1P acting at S1P1 receptors and possibly other targets in the CNS can attenuate sensitivity to various pain stimuli. Interestingly, other endogenous sphingolipid derivatives might play a role in central pain sensitization. Moreover, these sphingolipids can also act as CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonists, but the physiological relevance of this interaction is unknown. Overall, both eCB and sphingolipid systems offer promising targets for the treatment of chronic pain. This review compares and contrasts the eCB and S1P systems with a focus on their roles in pain modulation, and considers possible points of interaction between these systems.

Indexed as

AnimalsCannabinoid Receptor AntagonistsCannabinoidsCentral Nervous SystemEndocannabinoidsHumansLysophospholipidsPainSphingolipidsSphingosineCannabinoid Receptor AntagonistsCannabinoidsEndocannabinoidsLysophospholipidsSphingolipidsSphingosineAntinociceptionCB1 receptorHyperalgeisaSphingosine-1-phosphate

Identifiers

PMID23782998
PMCPMC4128475
OpenAlexW2012205316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.