Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23782962›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

A randomized controlled study to evaluate the immunogenicity of a trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine at two dosages in children 6 to 35 months of age.

Noris Pavia-Ruz, Miguel Angel Rodriguez Weber, Yu-Lung Lau, E Anthony S Nelson, Angkool Kerdpanich, Li-Min Huang, Peter Silas, Paul Qaqundah, Mark Blatter, Robert Jeanfreau and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00764790 (Immunogenicity and Safety of GSK Biologicals' Thimerosal-free TIV Flu Vaccine Versus a Licensed Comparator in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00764790 phase3completednot on this map

Immunogenicity and Safety of GSK Biologicals' Thimerosal-free TIV Flu Vaccine Versus a Licensed Comparator in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2008 to 2009Enrolled3,317ConditionsInfluenzaArmsFluarix, Fluzone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Influenza vaccines: Evaluation of the safety profile.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Noris Pavia-RuzUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; Mexico City, Mexico.
Miguel Angel Rodriguez Weber
Yu-Lung Lau
E Anthony S Nelson
Angkool Kerdpanich
Li-Min Huang
Peter Silas
Paul Qaqundah
Mark Blatter
Robert Jeanfreau
Paul Lei
Varsha Jain
Mohamed El Idrissi
Yang Feng
Bruce Innis
Mathieu Peeters
Jeanne-Marie Devaster
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEChinese University of Hong Kong · CNDigital Research Alliance of CanadaDraper Laboratory · USNational Hospital of Pediatrics · VNNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWPhramongkutklao Hospital · THSyracuse University · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine Fluarix™ is licensed in the US for adults and children from 3 years old. This randomized observer-blind study (NCT00764790) evaluated Fluarix™ at two doses; 0.25 ml (Flu-25) and 0.5 ml (Flu-50) in children aged 6-35 months. The primary objective was to demonstrate immunogenic non-inferiority vs. a control vaccine (Fluzone®; 0.25 ml). Children received Flu-25 (n = 1107), Flu-50 (n = 1106) or control vaccine (n = 1104) at Day 0 and for un-primed children, also on Day 28. Serum hemagglutination-inhibition titers were determined pre-vaccination and at Day 28 (primed) or Day 56 (un-primed). Non-inferiority was assessed by post-vaccination geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio, (upper 95% confidence interval [CI] ≤ 1.5) and difference in seroconversion rate (upper 95% CI ≤ 10%). Reactogenicity/safety was monitored. The immune response to Flu-50 met all regulatory criteria. Indicated by adjusted GMT ratios [with 95% CI], the criteria for non-inferiority of Flu-50 vs. control vaccine were reached for the B/Florida strain (1.13 [1.01-1.25]) but not for the A/Brisbane/H1N1 (1.74 [1.54-1.98]) or A/Uruguay/H3N2 (1.72 [1.57-1.89]) strains. In children aged 18-35 months similar immune responses were observed for Flu-50 and the control vaccine. Flu-50 induced a higher response than Flu-25 for all strains. Temperature (≥ 37.5°C) was reported in 6.2%, 6.4%, and 6.6% of the Flu-25, Flu-50, and control group, respectively. Reactogenicity/safety endpoints were within the same range for all vaccines. In children aged 6-35 months, immune responses with Flu-50 fulfilled regulatory criteria but did not meet the pre-defined criteria for non-inferiority vs. control. This appeared to be due to differences in immunogenicity in children aged<18 months.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralChild, PreschoolDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfantInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralfluarixInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivatedchildrenimmunogenicityinfluenzatrivalent inactivatedvaccine

Identifiers

PMID23782962
PMCPMC3906365
OpenAlexW1983399734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.