Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23782932›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2013

Embrace, a model for integrated elderly care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness regarding patient outcomes, service use, costs, and quality of care.

Sophie L W Spoorenberg, Ronald J Uittenbroek, Berrie Middel, Berry P H Kremer, Sijmen A Reijneveld, Klaske Wynia

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The Partners in Health scale for older adults: design and examination of its psychometric properties in a Dutch population of older adults.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Developing a Conceptual Framework for an Age-Friendly Health System: A Scoping Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health service delivery models for elderly people: A systematic review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophie L W SpoorenbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P,O, BOX 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. s.l.w.spoorenberg@umcg.nl
Ronald J Uittenbroek
Berrie Middel
Berry P H Kremer
Sijmen A Reijneveld
Klaske Wynia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOngoing growth in health care expenditures and changing patterns in the demand for health care challenge societies worldwide. The Chronic Care Model (CCM), combined with classification for care needs based on Kaiser Permanente (KP) Triangle, may offer a suitable framework for change. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of Embrace, a population-based model for integrated elderly care, regarding patient outcomes, service use, costs, and quality of care. METHODS/

designThe CCM and the KP Triangle were translated to the Dutch setting and adapted to the full elderly population living in the community. A randomized controlled trial with balanced allocation was designed to test the effectiveness of Embrace. Eligible elderly persons are 75 years and older and enrolled with one of the participating general practitioner practices. Based on scores on the INTERMED-Elderly Self-Assessment and Groningen Frailty Indicator, participants will be stratified into one of three strata: (A) robust; (B) frail; and (C) complex care needs. Next, participants will be randomized per stratum to Embrace or care as usual. Embrace encompasses an Elderly Care Team per general practitioner practice, an Electronic Elderly Record System, decision support instruments, and a self-management support and prevention program - combined with care and support intensity levels increasing from stratum A to stratum C. Primary outcome variables are patient outcomes, service use, costs, and quality of care. Data will be collected at baseline, twelve months after starting date, and during the intervention period. DISCUSSION: This study could provide evidence for the effectiveness of Embrace.

trial registrationThe Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3039.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleNetherlandsPatient CareQuality of Health CareTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23782932
PMCPMC3702391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.