Trial reportTrials2013
Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01323686 (Empiric Versus Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Empiric Versus Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geometric Changes in Mitral Valve Apparatus during Long-term Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy as Assessed with Cardiac CT.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Trial
- Optimizing heart failure treatment following cardiac resynchronization therapy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Trial
- Left atrial size and function as assessed by computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Association to echocardiographic and clinical outcome.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017Trial
- Cardiac remodelling and functional status after cardiac resynchronization therapy: comparison between de-novo implantation and upgrade from right ventricular pacing.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Using a Lead Placement Score Derived From 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Non-invasive estimation of QLV from the standard 12-lead ECG in patients with left bundle branch block.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Article
- A Review of Image-guided Approaches for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2017Article
- Early changes in right ventricular longitudinal function in chronic asymptomatic alcoholics revealed by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2016Article
- Nuclear Image-Guided Approaches for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT).Current cardiology reports · 2016Review
- Nuclear image-guided left ventricular pacing lead navigation feasibility of a new technique.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2015Article
- Speckle tracking echocardiography: clinical applications in cardiac resynchronization therapy.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Review
- Update on Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy for Heart Failure.European cardiology · 2014Review
- Pre-Implant Assessment For Optimal LV Lead Placement In CRT: ECG, ECHO, or MRI?Journal of atrial fibrillationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in heart failure patients. However, a large proportion of patients remain nonresponsive to this pacing strategy. Left ventricular (LV) lead position is one of the main determinants of response to CRT. This study aims to clarify whether multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement improves clinical outcome after CRT. METHODS/
designThe ImagingCRT study is a prospective, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, two-armed trial. The study is designed to investigate the effect of imaging guided left ventricular lead positioning on a clinical composite primary endpoint comprising all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, or unchanged or worsened functional capacity (no improvement in New York Heart Association class and <10% improvement in six-minute-walk test). Imaging guided LV lead positioning is targeted to the latest activated non-scarred myocardial region by speckle tracking echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac computed tomography. Secondary endpoints include changes in LV dimensions, ejection fraction and dyssynchrony. A total of 192 patients are included in the study. DISCUSSION: Despite tremendous advances in knowledge with CRT, the proportion of patients not responding to this treatment has remained stable since the introduction of CRT. ImagingCRT is a prospective, randomized study assessing the clinical and echocardiographic effect of multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement in CRT. The results are expected to make an important contribution in the pursuit of increasing response rate to CRT.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01323686. The trial was registered March 25, 2011 and the first study subject was randomized April 11, 2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.