Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23782792›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Anders Sommer, Mads Brix Kronborg, Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, Morten Böttcher, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Kirsten Bouchelouche, Peter Thomas Mortensen, Christian Gerdes, Jens Cosedis Nielsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01323686 (Empiric Versus Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01323686 nacompletednot on this map

Empiric Versus Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2011 to 2014Enrolled182ConditionsHeart FailureArmsImaging guided optimal LV lead placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Optimizing heart failure treatment following cardiac resynchronization therapy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Nuclear image-guided left ventricular pacing lead navigation feasibility of a new technique.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2015
    Article
  12. Speckle tracking echocardiography: clinical applications in cardiac resynchronization therapy.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anders SommerDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Brendstrupgaardsvej 100, Skejby DK-8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. a.sommer@dadlnet.dk
Mads Brix Kronborg
Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen
Morten Böttcher
Bjarne Linde Nørgaard
Kirsten Bouchelouche
Peter Thomas Mortensen
Christian Gerdes
Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Aarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in heart failure patients. However, a large proportion of patients remain nonresponsive to this pacing strategy. Left ventricular (LV) lead position is one of the main determinants of response to CRT. This study aims to clarify whether multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement improves clinical outcome after CRT. METHODS/

designThe ImagingCRT study is a prospective, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, two-armed trial. The study is designed to investigate the effect of imaging guided left ventricular lead positioning on a clinical composite primary endpoint comprising all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, or unchanged or worsened functional capacity (no improvement in New York Heart Association class and <10% improvement in six-minute-walk test). Imaging guided LV lead positioning is targeted to the latest activated non-scarred myocardial region by speckle tracking echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac computed tomography. Secondary endpoints include changes in LV dimensions, ejection fraction and dyssynchrony. A total of 192 patients are included in the study. DISCUSSION: Despite tremendous advances in knowledge with CRT, the proportion of patients not responding to this treatment has remained stable since the introduction of CRT. ImagingCRT is a prospective, randomized study assessing the clinical and echocardiographic effect of multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement in CRT. The results are expected to make an important contribution in the pursuit of increasing response rate to CRT.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01323686. The trial was registered March 25, 2011 and the first study subject was randomized April 11, 2011.

Indexed as

Research DesignVentricular Function, LeftCardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesClinical ProtocolsDenmarkDiagnostic ImagingDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodEchocardiography, DopplerExercise TestExercise ToleranceHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID23782792
PMCPMC3762069
OpenAlexW2147775516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.