Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23782555›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

A multi-center study on the regenerative effects of erythropoietin in burn and scalding injuries: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Christina Irene Günter, Augustinus Bader, Ulf Dornseifer, Silvia Egert, Sebastian Dunda, Gerrit Grieb, Thomas Wolter, Norbert Pallua, Tobias von Wild, Frank Siemers and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Burn Wound Microenvironment.Advances in wound care · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of erythropoietin on intensive care unit patients.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Christina Irene Günter
Augustinus Bader
Ulf Dornseifer
Silvia Egert
Sebastian Dunda
Gerrit Grieb
Thomas Wolter
Norbert Pallua
Tobias von Wild
Frank Siemers
Peter Mailänder
Oliver Thamm
Carsten Ernert
Michael Steen
Reiner Sievers
Bert Reichert
Afshin Rahmanian-Schwarz
Hans Schaller
Bernd Hartmann
Max Otte
Victoria Kehl
Christian Ohmann
Wolfgang Jelkmann
Hans-Günther Machens
RWTH Aachen University · DETechnical University of Munich · DEBG Klinik Tübingen · DEBG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle · DENuremberg Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DELeipzig University · DEMünchen Klinik Bogenhausen · DEUnfallkrankenhaus Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough it was initially assumed that erythropoietin (EPO) was a hormone that only affected erythropoiesis, it has now been proposed that EPO plays an additional key role in the regulation of acute and chronic tissue damage. METHODS/

designThis is a large, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multi-center study, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, and fully approved by the designated ethics committee. The trial, which is to investigate the effects of EPO in severely burned patients, is in its recruitment phase and is being carried out in 13 German burn care centers. A total of 150 patients are to be enrolled to receive study medication every other day for 21 days (EPO 150 IU/kg body weight or placebo). A follow-up of one year is planned. The primary endpoint of this study is the time until complete re-epithelialization of a defined skin graft donor site is reached. Furthermore, clinical parameters such as wound healing, scar formation (using the Vancouver scar scale), laboratory values, quality of life (SF-36), angiogenic effects, and gene- and protein-expression patterns are to be determined. The results will be carefully evaluated for gender differences. DISCUSSION: We are seeking new insights into the mechanisms of wound healing in thermally injured patients and more detailed information about the role EPO plays, specifically in these complex interactions. We additionally expect that the biomimetic effects of EPO will be useful in the treatment of acute thermal dermal injuries.

trial registrationEudraCT Number: 2006-002886-38, Protocol Number: 0506, ISRCT Number: http://controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN95777824/ISRCTN95777824.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdolescentAdultAgedBurnsClinical ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleErythropoietinFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecombinant Proteinsepoetin betaErythropoietinRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23782555
PMCPMC3653694
OpenAlexW2151917551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.