Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23782540›Full record

Trial reportReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2013

First intention IVF protocol for polycystic ovaries: does oral contraceptive pill pretreatment influence COH outcome?

Christine Decanter, Geoffroy Robin, Patricia Thomas, Maryse Leroy, Catherine Lefebvre, Benoit Soudan, Valerie Lefebvre-Khalil, Brigitte Leroy-Martin, Didier Dewailly

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Comparative Effectiveness of Three Ovarian Hyperstimulation Protocol in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Cycles for Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine DecanterIVF center of Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, Department of Endocrine Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire CHRU, Rue Eugène Avinée, 59037, Lille Cedex, France. christine.decanter@chru-lille.fr
Geoffroy Robin
Patricia Thomas
Maryse Leroy
Catherine Lefebvre
Benoit Soudan
Valerie Lefebvre-Khalil
Brigitte Leroy-Martin
Didier Dewailly
Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorphological aspect of polycystic ovaries (PCO) is a very common finding in an IVF center population: this includes PCOS patients identified in 18-25% of the couples presenting with infertility and so called "sonographic PCO only" the prevalence of which has been estimated as high as 33% in asymptomatic patients. Finding the optimal first intention IVF protocol for polycystic ovaries patients is still challenging in order to improve the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) outcome while avoiding ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). It has been suggested that women with PCO would benefit from a longer period of pituitary down-regulation. The purpose of this study was to compare an extended duration of OCP pretreatment with a classic GnRH agonist protocol.

methodsA single center prospective non-randomized study was performed from January 2009 to December 2010 in the Lille University Hospital including 113 women diagnosed with PCO(S) according to the Rotterdam ultrasonographic criteria and undergoing their first IVF attempt. Comprehensive hormonal and ultra-sonographic assessments were collected during COH in these patients. LH and androgen suppression and dynamics of follicular growth were compared between the two protocols as well as the COH outcome in terms of oocyte/embryo number and quality, implantation and pregnancy rates.

resultsNo significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning dynamics of follicular growth and hormonal values. Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly lower in the OCP group despite same oocyte and embryo quality. Nevertheless, the cumulative pregnancy rate did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of OHSS was not statistically significant.

conclusionsExtended duration of OCP pretreatment, as a first intention IVF protocol for PCO patients, does not improve the pattern of follicular growth nor the oocyte and embryo quality.

Indexed as

AdultAndrostenedioneContraceptives, OralDesogestrelDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationEmbryo TransferEthinyl EstradiolFemaleFertilization in VitroFollicle Stimulating HormoneGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeOvulation InductionPolycystic Ovary SyndromeAndrostenedioneContraceptives, OralDesogestrelEthinyl EstradiolFollicle Stimulating HormoneGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneRecombinant ProteinsTestosteroneTriptorelin Pamoate

Identifiers

PMID23782540
PMCPMC3710227
OpenAlexW2104712609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.