Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23782520›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Efficacy of individualized homeopathic treatment and fluoxetine for moderate to severe depression in peri- and postmenopausal women (HOMDEP-MENOP): study protocol for a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Emma del Carmen Macías-Cortés, Leopoldo Aguilar-Faisal, Juan Asbun-Bojalil

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01635218 (Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Treatment for Moderate to Severe Depression in Peri- and Postmenopausal Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01635218 phase2completednot on this map

Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Treatment for Moderate to Severe Depression in Peri- and Postmenopausal Women: a Randomized Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Juarez de MexicoRan2012 to 2014Enrolled133ConditionsModerate Depression, Menopausal and Postmenopausal DisordersArmsIndividualized homeopathic treatment, Fluoxetine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma del Carmen Macías-CortésEscuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ave, Plan de San Luis y Salvador Díaz Mirón, Casco de Santo Tomás, Distrito Federal CP 11340, Mexico. ecmc2008@hotmail.es
Leopoldo Aguilar-Faisal
Juan Asbun-Bojalil
Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXHospital Juárez de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe perimenopausal period refers to the interval when women's menstrual cycles become irregular and is characterized by an increased risk of depressive symptoms. Use of homeopathy to treat depression is widespread but there is a lack of clinical trials about its efficacy in depression in peri- and postmenopausal women. Previous trials suggest that individualized homeopathic treatments improve depression. In classical homeopathy, an individually selected homeopathic remedy is prescribed after a complete case history of the patient. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the homeopathic individualized treatment versus placebo or fluoxetine in peri- and postmenopausal women with moderate to severe depression. METHODS/

designA randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, three-arm trial with a six-week follow-up study was designed. The study will be conducted in a public research hospital in Mexico City (Juárez de México Hospital) in the outpatient service of homeopathy. One hundred eighty nine peri- and postmenopausal women diagnosed with major depression according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (moderate to severe intensity) will be included. The primary outcome is change in the mean total score among groups on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression after the fourth and sixth week of treatment. Secondary outcomes are: Beck Depression Inventory change in mean score, Greene's Scale change in mean score, response and remission rates and safety. Efficacy data will be analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. To determine differences in the primary and secondary outcomes among groups at baseline and weeks four and six, data will be analyzed by analysis of variance for independent measures with the Bonferroni post-hoc test. DISCUSSION: This study is the first trial of classical homeopathy that will evaluate the efficacy of homeopathic individualized treatment using C-potencies versus placebo or fluoxetine in peri- and postmenopausal women with moderate to severe depression. It is an attempt to deal with the obstacles of homeopathic research due to the need for individual prescriptions in one of the most common psychiatric diseases.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01635218.

Indexed as

Research DesignAnalysis of VarianceAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationClinical ProtocolsDepressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFluoxetineHospitals, PublicHumansMateria MedicaMexicoPerimenopausePostmenopausePrecision MedicinePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationFluoxetineMateria MedicaSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23782520
PMCPMC3748824
OpenAlexW2123679079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.