Trial reportImplementation science : IS2013
Evaluation of an interactive program for preventing adverse drug events in primary care: study protocol of the InPAct cluster randomised stepped wedge trial.
Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01610817 (Impact of a Procedure for the Information and Active Participation of the Patient in the Primary Care Prescription of Antihypertensives), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of a Procedure for the Information and Active Participation of the Patient in the Primary Care Prescription of Antihypertensives : InPAct Study (Information for Participating Actively in Cardiovascular Treatment)
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014.Trials · 2015Pooled it
- Improving patient self-reporting of antihypertensive adverse drug events in primary care: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.BMC family practice · 2021Trial
- Nurse-Led Medicines' Monitoring for Patients with Dementia in Care Homes: A Pragmatic Cohort Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Considerations Before Selecting a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Design for a Practice Improvement Study.Annals of family medicineTrial
- Optimal Designs in Open-Cohort Longitudinal Cluster Randomized Trials With a Continuous Outcome.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2026Article
- Article
- Logistic, ethical, and political dimensions of stepped wedge trials: critical review and case studies.Trials · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdverse drug events could often be prevented. One of their main causes is that patients rarely know how to detect them. Another cause is inadequate communication between patients and physicians. If patients were to be effectively trained in detecting and reporting adverse drug events, this should help to prevent their occurrence and subsequent complications. Our purpose is to present the protocol of the InPAct trial, which aims to evaluate an interactive program that encourages patients to report adverse drug events in primary care. METHODS/
designWe will conduct a cluster randomised controlled stepped wedge trial, with eight clusters of 10 general practitioners each. The physicians will suggest to all of their antihypertensive-treated patients that they take part in this study. The InPAct program will be implemented in the clusters in random order along five successive three-month periods. Two new clusters will be trained in implementing the program at each step. The program features: an interactive patient booklet including informative paragraphs, several care plans and adverse drug event report forms; and standardised training of physicians in how to present the booklet to the patient. The primary outcome will be the reporting of adverse drug events by patients to their physician within three months. We assume that the number of patients reporting at least one adverse drug event will increase from 3% before program implementation to 7.5% afterward (coefficient of variation = 0.5, α = 0.05, β = 0.2), which means that 1,200 patients must be included. The effect of the intervention on the main outcome will be quantified and tested using a mixed logistic model to integrate cluster and time effects. DISCUSSION: Our choice of a stepped wedge design is particularly appropriate for evaluating the implementation of a patient safety program within the constraints of general practice. We describe the InPAct intervention, which is an original program that is intended to improve communication between patients and physicians. Indeed, none of the previously published intervention studies has combined a patient education program and a patient reporting system for adverse drug events with the aim of improving patient safety in primary care.
trial registrationThis study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01610817.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.