Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23782470›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2013

Evaluation of an interactive program for preventing adverse drug events in primary care: study protocol of the InPAct cluster randomised stepped wedge trial.

Maud Keriel-Gascou, Karine Buchet-Poyau, Antoine Duclos, Muriel Rabilloud, Sophie Figon, Jean-Pierre Dubois, Jean Brami, Thierry Vial, Cyrille Colin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01610817 (Impact of a Procedure for the Information and Active Participation of the Patient in the Primary Care Prescription of Antihypertensives), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01610817 completednot on this map

Impact of a Procedure for the Information and Active Participation of the Patient in the Primary Care Prescription of Antihypertensives : InPAct Study (Information for Participating Actively in Cardiovascular Treatment)

TypeobservationalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2012 to 2014Enrolled1,100ConditionsPatients on Anti-hypertensive MedicationArmsInPAct : Information for Participating Actively in cardiovascular treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maud Keriel-GascouUniversité de Lyon, Lyon F-69000, France. maud.kerielg@free.fr
Karine Buchet-Poyau
Antoine Duclos
Muriel Rabilloud
Sophie Figon
Jean-Pierre Dubois
Jean Brami
Thierry Vial
Cyrille Colin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse drug events could often be prevented. One of their main causes is that patients rarely know how to detect them. Another cause is inadequate communication between patients and physicians. If patients were to be effectively trained in detecting and reporting adverse drug events, this should help to prevent their occurrence and subsequent complications. Our purpose is to present the protocol of the InPAct trial, which aims to evaluate an interactive program that encourages patients to report adverse drug events in primary care. METHODS/

designWe will conduct a cluster randomised controlled stepped wedge trial, with eight clusters of 10 general practitioners each. The physicians will suggest to all of their antihypertensive-treated patients that they take part in this study. The InPAct program will be implemented in the clusters in random order along five successive three-month periods. Two new clusters will be trained in implementing the program at each step. The program features: an interactive patient booklet including informative paragraphs, several care plans and adverse drug event report forms; and standardised training of physicians in how to present the booklet to the patient. The primary outcome will be the reporting of adverse drug events by patients to their physician within three months. We assume that the number of patients reporting at least one adverse drug event will increase from 3% before program implementation to 7.5% afterward (coefficient of variation = 0.5, α = 0.05, β = 0.2), which means that 1,200 patients must be included. The effect of the intervention on the main outcome will be quantified and tested using a mixed logistic model to integrate cluster and time effects. DISCUSSION: Our choice of a stepped wedge design is particularly appropriate for evaluating the implementation of a patient safety program within the constraints of general practice. We describe the InPAct intervention, which is an original program that is intended to improve communication between patients and physicians. Indeed, none of the previously published intervention studies has combined a patient education program and a patient reporting system for adverse drug events with the aim of improving patient safety in primary care.

trial registrationThis study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01610817.

Indexed as

AdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCluster AnalysisDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEducation, Medical, GraduateGeneral PracticeHumansMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePamphletsPatient Education as TopicPilot ProjectsYoung AdultAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23782470
PMCPMC3689059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.