ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2013
Posttraumatic stress disorders in the Nanai after pollution of the Amur River: ethnocultural analysis.
Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) severity and ego structure of the Nanai people.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Comparison ofPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesChemical pollution of the Amur River has seriously damaged traditions and caused posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among the Nanai, the indigenous people living along this river. This study was performed to clarify the ethnographic characteristics of PTSD in this unique population.
methodsThe study group consisted of 75 male and 112 female randomly selected volunteers. PTSD severity measured using scores of the Impact of Event Scale--Revised (Total-I) and Clinical-Administered PTSD Scale (Total-C) was estimated according to demographic and ethnocultural backgrounds, clinical status, and ethnopsychological attitudes toward the Amur River.
resultsThe differences in averages of Total-I and Total-C were not always the same in the groups divided by ethnographic information. Logistic regression analysis with a dependent variable, possibly without PTSD (Total-I <34 and Total-C <40)/possibly with PTSD (either Total-I ≥34 or Total-C ≥40), and categorical independent variables using ethnographic information extracted a low score when 'priority values' and 'the Amur River for me is' was "profession" and a high score when 'dominant role in spousal relationship' was "self," when 'predominant forms of response in stressful situations' was "try to organize," when 'preferred method of medical treatment' was specific for the Nanai, when "rely on something mystical" was manifested, and when the Amur River was believed to be "sacred".
conclusionThose with a pragmatic attitude were less likely to have PTSD. However, those who were required to make decisions within close relationships and were intimate with the Nanai tradition and the Amur River had increased likelihood of PTSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.