Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23780679›Full record

ArticleNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2013

International survey of nephrologists' perceptions and attitudes about rewards and compensations for kidney donation.

Nasrollah Ghahramani, Zahra Karparvar, Mehrdad Ghahramani, Shahrouz Shadrou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Public Opinions on Removing Disincentives and Introducing Incentives for Organ Donation: Proposing a European Research Agenda.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 'Because you can't live on love': living kidney donors' perspectives on compensation and payment for organ donation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  6. A review of the possibility of adopting financially driven live donor kidney transplantation.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nasrollah GhahramaniPennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hershey, PA, USA. nghahramani@hmc.psu.edu
Zahra Karparvar
Mehrdad Ghahramani
Shahrouz Shadrou
Pennsylvania State University · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

Impact of perceptions on choice of kidney transplant in rural AppalachiaK23DK084300 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI GHAHRAMANI, NASROLLAH · 2009 to 2013
$901k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK084300NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK084300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPayment for organ donation, whether in the form of incentives, rewards or compensation is highly debated and has been denounced by many professional and legislative bodies. Despite the passionate discussion in the literature, there is very limited data on attitudes and perceptions of physicians about providing rewards or compensation to organ donors. We investigated the relationship between demographic and practice characteristics of nephrologists and their perceptions and attitudes about rewards and compensations for organ donation.

methodsUsing a web-based survey, we explored the views of nephrologists around the world about rewards and compensations for kidney donation. The relationship between attitudes and demographic characteristics of 1280 nephrologists from 74 countries was examined by univariate and multivariable analyses.

resultsSeventy-five percent agreed with donor health insurance, 26% favored direct financial compensation and 31% agreed with financial rewards for unrelated donors. Sixty-six percent believed that rewards will lead to increased donation. Seventy-three percent indicated that rewards will lead to exploitation of the poor and 78% agreed with legislation prohibiting organ sales. Thirty-seven percent believed that rewards will negatively impact deceased-donor transplantation. Nephrologists from India/Pakistan and the Middle East had more favorable views about rewards, while respondents from Latin America and Europe, older than 50, female nephrologists and those practicing in rural areas had less favorable views.

conclusionsWe conclude that a minority of nephrologists favor rewards for donation, many agree with some compensation and a considerable majority favor donor health insurance. Perceptions of nephrologists about rewards and compensation are influenced by age, sex, urban versus rural location and geographic region of practice.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelLiving DonorsMotivationRewardCompensation and RedressFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthInternationalityKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPhysiciansTissue and Organ Procurementdonorincentivequestionnairerenalsurveytransplantation

Identifiers

PMID23780679
PMCPMC3685310
OpenAlexW2151105525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.