SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03039036 (A Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Amniotomy Versus Delayed Amniotomy Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Nulliparous Labor Induction), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Amniotomy Versus Delayed Amniotomy Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Nulliparous Labor Induction
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Accelerating newborn survival in Ghana through a low-dose, high-frequency health worker training approach: a cluster randomized trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Trial
- Effect of early amniotomy on the outcome of spontaneous labour: a randomized controlled trial of pregnant women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.African health sciences · 2015Trial
- Early versus late amniotomy during twin labor.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Is amniotomy a risk factor for severe perineal trauma? -A Swedish nationwide register study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Attributes of Nulliparous Women Who Have a Spontaneous Vaginal Birth in Queensland: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- Caul birth: A retrospective cohort study on prevalence, predictors, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.European journal of midwifery · 2026Article
- Fetal head station during artificial rupture of membranes: a large retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Rupture of Membranes and Spontaneous Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review of Feto-Maternal Outcomes.Cureus · 2025Review
- Incidence and risk factors for umbilical cord prolapse in labor when amniotomy is used and with spontaneous rupture of membranes: A Swedish nationwide register study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- The Correct Indication to Induce Labour in a Swiss Cantonal Hospital.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Prevalence of amniotomy in Sweden: a nationwide register study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- 'Labour Hopscotch': Women's evaluation of using the steps during labor.European journal of midwifery · 2022Article
- Association of body mass index and maternal age with first stage duration of labour.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Oxytocin Administration in Low-Risk Women, a Retrospective Analysis of Birth and Neonatal Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, November 2020.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2020Article
- Pregnant women's clinical characteristics, intrapartum interventions, and duration of labour in urban China: a multi-center cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntentional artificial rupture of the amniotic membranes during labour, sometimes called amniotomy or 'breaking of the waters', is one of the most commonly performed procedures in modern obstetric and midwifery practice. The primary aim of amniotomy is to speed up contractions and, therefore, shorten the length of labour. However, there are concerns regarding unintended adverse effects on the woman and baby.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness and safety of amniotomy alone for routinely shortening all labours that start spontaneously. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 April 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes. We excluded quasi-randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed identified studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat. MAIN
resultsWe have included 15 studies in this updated review, involving 5583 women. Amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes (no amniotomy) for spontaneous labour There was no clear statistically significant difference between women in the amniotomy and control groups in length of the first stage of labour (mean difference (MD) -20.43 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) -95.93 to 55.06), caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.63), maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience (MD -1.10, 95% CI -7.15 to 4.95) or Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.00). There was no consistency between trials regarding the timing of amniotomy during labour in terms of cervical dilatation. Amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes (no amniotomy) for spontaneous labours that have become prolonged There was no clear statistically significant difference between women in the amniotomy and control group in caesarean section (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.15 to 6.08), maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience (MD 22.00, 95% CI 2.74 to 41.26) or Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 2.86, 95% CI 0.12 to 66.11). AUTHORS'
conclusionsOn the basis of the findings of this review, we cannot recommend that amniotomy should be introduced routinely as part of standard labour management and care. We recommend that the evidence presented in this review should be made available to women offered an amniotomy and may be useful as a foundation for discussion and any resulting decisions made between women and their caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.