ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2013
Comparative analysis of the revenues of pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resections and laparoscopic cholecystectomies as prototypic surgical procedures in the German health-care system.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic pressures threaten surgical quality in Germany: immediate policy action required.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough centralization of complex surgical procedures such as pancreaticoduodenectomies is associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality rates, it is unclear whether such surgeries are adequately represented in the German disease-related group (DRG) system. PATIENTS AND
methodsOut of all patients who underwent pancreatic resections (n = 450) at our institution between January 2008 and November 2011, 76 patients who underwent a pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection due to pancreatic head adenocarcinoma were selected for analysis. The revenues generated by these surgical procedures were compared with those of 144 patients who had undergone elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies for symptomatic gallstone disease between January 2009 and September 2010 in our hospital.
resultsIn patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, revenues per case were 1,585.55 Euros, with an average length of hospital stay (ALOS) of 19.9 days (range 7-55 days) and an average postoperative hospital stay of 16 days; however, if the ALOS was exceeded, expenditures increasingly exceeded returns. Analysis of the cohort of patients with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomies demonstrated average revenues per day of 79.27 Euros. In contrast, for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which was treated with high surgical standardization and stringent case management, the ALOS was only 2.8 days, producing average revenues of 288.80 Euros per day and total revenues of 817.53 Euros per case.
conclusionAt university hospitals, cost-effective realization of major pancreatic surgery is difficult, while highly standardized surgeries such as laparoscopic cholecystectomies can be performed at a favorable balance. This may be due to, firstly, an underrepresentation of university hospitals in the German DRG calculation basis and, secondly, to a relatively long preoperative hospital stay as a result of extensive diagnostic measures. We consider this kind of preoperative assessment paramount for an academic pancreatic center and thus argue for an increased reimbursement for these procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.