SynthesisBMC veterinary research2013
Methods used to estimate the size of the owned cat and dog population: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC veterinary research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Canine Osteoarthritis Research.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Welfare Under Transient Pressure: Rethinking Behavioral Assessments and Stress Mitigation for Shelter Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Evaluating the 2024 dog oral rabies vaccination campaign in the Zambezi region, Namibia using GIS and household surveys.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exposure of Domestic Cats (Toxics · 2025Article
- Free-roaming dog populations and movement methodologies for global rabies elimination: knowns and unknowns - a scoping review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Outcomes of a Short-Duration, Large-Scale Canine Rabies Vaccination Campaign in Central Cambodia.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Dog ecology and rabies knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) in the Northern Communal Areas of Namibia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Trends in companion animal access to veterinary care in Canada, 2007 to 2020.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024Article
- Understanding the dog population in the Republic of Ireland: insight from existing data sources?Irish veterinary journal · 2022Article
- Scaling-up the delivery of dog vaccination campaigns against rabies in Tanzania.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Demography and determinants of dog and cat ownership in three towns of West Shoa zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia.BMC veterinary research · 2020Article
- Cats show an unexpected pattern of response to human ostensive cues in a series of A-not-B error tests.Animal cognition · 2020Article
- Size, demography, ownership profiles, and identification rate of the owned dog population in central Italy.PloS one · 2020Article
- Effects of Gender, Sterilization, and Environment on the Spatial Distribution of Free-Roaming Dogs: An Intervention Study in an Urban Setting.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Article
- Estimating the Size of Dog Populations in Tanzania to Inform Rabies Control.Veterinary sciences · 2018Article
- Barriers to dog rabies vaccination during an urban rabies outbreak: Qualitative findings from Arequipa, Peru.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017Article
- Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS).BMJ open · 2016Article
- A Cross-Sectional Survey to Estimate the Cat Population and Ownership Profiles in a Semirural Area of Central Italy.BioMed research international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are a number of different methods that can be used when estimating the size of the owned cat and dog population in a region, leading to varying population estimates. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the methods that have been used for estimating the sizes of owned cat and dog populations and to assess the biases associated with those methods.A comprehensive, systematic search of seven electronic bibliographic databases and the Google search engine was carried out using a range of different search terms for cats, dogs and population. The inclusion criteria were that the studies had involved owned or pet domestic dogs and/or cats, provided an estimate of the size of the owned dog or cat population, collected raw data on dog and cat ownership, and analysed primary data. Data relating to study methodology were extracted and assessed for biases.
resultsSeven papers were included in the final analysis. Collection methods used to select participants in the included studies were: mailed surveys using a commercial list of contacts, door to door surveys, random digit dialled telephone surveys, and randomised telephone surveys using a commercial list of numbers. Analytical and statistical methods used to estimate the pet population size were: mean number of dogs/cats per household multiplied by the number of households in an area, human density multiplied by number of dogs per human, and calculations using predictors of pet ownership.
conclusionThe main biases of the studies included selection bias, non-response bias, measurement bias and biases associated with length of sampling time. Careful design and planning of studies is a necessity before executing a study to estimate pet populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.