Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23777420›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2014

Understanding roles of porcine small intestinal submucosa in urinary bladder regeneration: identification of variable regenerative characteristics of small intestinal submucosa.

Hsueh-Kung Lin, Shirley Yezdi Godiwalla, Blake Palmer, Dominic Frimberger, Qing Yang, Sundar V Madihally, Kar-Ming Fung, Bradley P Kropp

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03902938 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Use of Biodesign® Otologic Graft in Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2018 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsOtologic DiseaseArmsBiodesign Otologic graft, Autograft temporalis fascia
NCT03904316 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Use of Biodesign® Otologic Graft in Tympanoplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2018 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsTympanic Membrane PerforationArmsBiodesign Otologic graft, Autologous temporalis fascia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Porcine-derived materials in urology Practical ethical guidance for caring for Muslim and Jewish patients.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. [Application and progress of bio-derived materials in bladder regeneration and repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Advance in functional bladder engineering].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Electrospinning: Application and Prospects for Urologic Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hsueh-Kung Lin1 Department of Urology, The Children's Hospital of Oklahoma, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center , Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Shirley Yezdi Godiwalla
Blake Palmer
Dominic Frimberger
Qing Yang
Sundar V Madihally
Kar-Ming Fung
Bradley P Kropp
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USOklahoma State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropathic bladders are the result from damages to the central or peripheral nervous system, and ultimately may require surgical reconstruction to increase bladder volumes and to reduce the risk of damages to the kidneys. Surgical reconstruction through bladder augmentation has traditionally been practiced using a segment of the ileum, colon, or stomach from the patient through enterocystoplasty. However, the use of gastrointestinal segments can lead to serious adverse consequences. Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS), a xenogeneic, acellular, biocompatable, biodegradable, and collagen-based bioscaffold is best known to encourage bladder regeneration without ex vivo cell seeding before implantation in various experimental and preclinical animal models. Although it has been demonstrated that SIS supports bladder cell growth in vitro, and SIS-regenerated bladders are histologically and functionally indistinguishable from normal functional tissues, clinical utilization of SIS for bladder augmentation has been hampered by inconsistent preclinical results. Several variables in SIS, such as the age of pigs, the region of the small intestine, and method of sterilization, can have different physical properties, biochemical characteristics, inflammatory cell infiltration, and regenerative capacity due to cellular responses in vitro and in vivo. These parameters are particularly important for bladder regeneration due to its specific biological function in urine storage. Clinical application of SIS for surgical bladder reconstruction may require graft materials to be prepared from a specific region of the small intestine, or to be further formulated or processed to provide uniform physical and biochemical properties for consistent, complete, and functional bladder regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesCystectomyHumansInflammationIntestine, SmallRegenerationSwineTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsUrinary BladderBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID23777420
PMCPMC3922139
OpenAlexW2029166087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.