ArticlePloS one2013
Activity determinants of helical antimicrobial peptides: a large-scale computational study.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanistic Insights into Human Defensin Antimicrobial Activity from Membrane Simulations.The Journal of membrane biology · 2026Article
- Structure-Antimicrobial Activity Relationships of Recombinant Host Defence Peptides Against Drug-Resistant Bacteria.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Correlation Between Antimicrobial Structural Classes and Membrane Partitioning: Role of Emerging Lipid Packing Defects.The Journal of membrane biology · 2024Article
- CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Review
- In silico and physico-chemical characterization of cluster formation dynamics in peptide solutions.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Article
- Teleost Piscidins-In Silico Perspective of Natural Peptide Antibiotics from Marine Sources.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Mechanism of negative membrane curvature generation by I-BAR domains.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2021Article
- What Makes a Good Pore Former: A Study of Synthetic Melittin Derivatives.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Membrane Thinning Induces Sorting of Lipids and the Amphipathic Lipid Packing Sensor (ALPS) Protein Motif.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Helices: Insights from Implicit Membrane Modeling.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Computational studies of peptide-induced membrane pore formation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
- Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides.Biophysical journal · 2016Article
- Article
- Implicit Membrane Investigation of the Stability of Antimicrobial Peptide β-Barrels and Arcs.The Journal of membrane biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), produced by a wide range of organisms, have attracted attention due to their potential use as novel antibiotics. The majority of these peptides are cationic and are thought to function by permeabilizing the bacterial membrane, either by making pores or by dissolving it ('carpet' model). A key hypothesis in the literature is that antimicrobial and hemolytic activity correlate with binding affinity to anionic and zwitterionic membranes, respectively. Here we test this hypothesis by using binding free energy data collected from the literature and theoretical binding energies calculated from implicit membrane models for 53 helical AMPs. We indeed find a correlation between binding energy and biological activity, depending on membrane anionic content: antibacterial activity correlates best with transfer energy to membranes with anionic lipid fraction higher than 30% and hemolytic activity correlates best with transfer energy to a 10% anionic membrane. However, the correlations are weak, with correlation coefficient up to 0.4. Weak correlations of the biological activities have also been found with other physical descriptors of the peptides, such as surface area occupation, which correlates significantly with antibacterial activity; insertion depth, which correlates significantly with hemolytic activity; and structural fluctuation, which correlates significantly with both activities. The membrane surface coverage by many peptides at the MIC is estimated to be much lower than would be required for the 'carpet' mechanism. Those peptides that are active at low surface coverage tend to be those identified in the literature as pore-forming. The transfer energy from planar membrane to cylindrical and toroidal pores was also calculated for these peptides. The transfer energy to toroidal pores is negative in almost all cases while that to cylindrical pores is more favorable in neutral than in anionic membranes. The transfer energy to pores correlates with the deviation from predictions of the 'carpet' model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.