ArticleThe application of clinical genetics2011
The genetics of breast cancer: risk factors for disease.
Article in The application of clinical genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Body mass index had different effects on premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer risks: a dose-response meta-analysis with 3,318,796 subjects from 31 cohort studies.BMC public health · 2017Pooled it
- Association between the BRCA2 rs144848 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- The polymorphism of EGFR 142285G > A exerts no risk effect on breast cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Article
- Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic diseases: A novel paradigm in embryo selection.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- CYP2D6 and CYP2E1 Gene Polymorphisms and Their Influence on Chemotherapy Treatment Outcome and Toxicity in Breast Cancer Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Molecular Subtypes and Mechanisms of Breast Cancer: Precision Medicine Approaches for Targeted Therapies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Genetic Polymorphism of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 Genes and Breast Cancer Risk in Rural Maharashtra: Insights from a Case- Control Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Review
- Examining the Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and MicroRNAs Regulation in Breast Cancer.The breast journal · 2025Review
- Genetic Polymorphisms of DNA Repair Genes and their Influence on Paclitaxel based Chemotherapy Induced Toxicity Reactions in Breast Cancer Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Applying whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing in breast cancer: a review of the landscape.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Review
- Comprehensive breast cancer risk analysis with whole exome sequencing and the prevalence ofBiomedical reports · 2024Article
- Exploring Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Hallmarks of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up in Clinical Practice.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Article
- Breast Cancer Risk and Prevention: A Step Forward.Cancers · 2023Article
- Impact of Interaction between Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3 with Tumor Suppressor Tp53 Gene Increases Risk of Breast Cancer: A Hospital Based Case-Control Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Clinical and Translational Applications of Serological and Histopathological Biomarkers in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- TP53 (rs1042522, rs28934571) and TP21 (rs1801270, rs1059234) Polymorphisms and Risk of Breast Cancer among Rural Women of Maharashtra: Findings from a Hospital Based Case- Control Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Polygenic risk scores and breast cancer risk prediction.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genetic factors known to be involved in breast cancer risk comprise about 30 genes. These include the high-penetrance early-onset breast cancer genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, a number of rare cancer syndrome genes, and rare genes with more moderate penetrance. A larger group of common variants has more recently been identified through genome-wide association studies. Quite a number of these common variants are mapped to genomic regions without being firmly associated with specific genes. It is thought that most of these variants have gene regulatory functions, but their precise roles in disease susceptibility are not well understood. Common variants account for only a small percentage of the risk of disease because they have low penetrance. Collectively, the breast cancer genes identified to date contribute only ~30% of the familial risk. Therefore, there is much interest in accounting for the missing heritability, and possible sources include loss of information through ignoring phenotype heterogeneity (disease subtypes have genetic differences), gene-gene and gene-environment interaction, and rarer forms of variation. Identification of these rarer variations in coding regions is now feasible and cost effective through exome sequencing, which has already identified high-penetrance variants for some rare diseases. Targeting more 'extreme' breast cancer phenotypes, particularly cases with early-onset disease, a strong family history (not accounted for by BRCA mutations), and with specific tumor subtypes, provides a route to progress using next-generation sequencing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.