ArticleThe application of clinical genetics2010
Genetic screening for homozygous and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
Article in The application of clinical genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of PCSK9 Inhibitors on LDL-C Target Achievement in Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2024Article
- A Novel Modified System of Simplified Chinese Criteria for Familial Hypercholesterolemia (SCCFH).Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2019Article
- The genetics and screening of familial hypercholesterolaemia.Journal of biomedical science · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder that results in premature atherosclerosis. Diagnosis of FH is suspected on the basis of clinical criteria, but confirmation requires genetic testing. In the era of statins, early diagnosis and initiation of treatment can modify disease progression and outcomes. Therefore, cascade screening with a combination of lipid concentration measurements and DNA testing should be used to identify relatives of index cases with a clinical diagnosis of FH. Autosomal dominant FH is related to mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B-100 (APOB), or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) genes. Genetic screening of the LDLR gene is challenging to achieve at a feasible cost, especially in people who do not have a founder effect. Nucleotide sequencing of all exons and flanking splicing regions in combination with multiplex ligation probe amplification to detect large insertions or deletions is considered the gold-standard approach to screen for LDLR mutations. Alternatively, the cDNA can be sequenced; however, this procedure is not suitable for use in large populations, because of the need of RNA extraction. Multiplex analysis can be appropriate for population with founder effects or a low number of different mutations. Finally, there are many techniques for a mutation scanning approach, which have some benefits over sequencing, and also with the potential for detecting known and novel mutations. Familial defective Apo B is amenable to genetic diagnosis by screening for a few mutations. Recently, gain-of-function mutations in PCSK9 gene have been demonstrated to cause FH phenotype. Strategies for population screening, cost-effectiveness of genetic screening, ethical aspects, and insurance policies are discussed and need implementation worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.