Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23775215›Full record

ArticleOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2013

[Infected knee prostheses. Part 2: chronic late infections].

P Herrmann, P Thoele, V Heppert

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P HerrmannAbteilung Unfall-, Wirbelsäulen- und Gelenkchirurgie, Asklepios-Südpfalzklinik Kandel, Luitpoldstr. 14, 76870 Kandel, Germany. pe.herrmann@asklepios.com
P Thoele
V Heppert
Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen · DEAsklepios Fachklinikum Brandenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTreatment of late and chronic infections, which require the replacement of all the infected implant material. INDICATIONS: All infections lasting more than 4 weeks that have been proven to be bacterial and/or obvious signs of infection. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Unsuitable for anesthesia, high acute infection with sepsis and risk for bacteremia with danger to life, large soft tissue damage where plastic surgery coverage is not possible. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Arthrotomy, synovectomy, removal of all foreign bodies including all residue of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), jet lavage, spacer, drainage, wound closure or temporary closure using vacuum sealing. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Bed rest with a leg brace and drainage until daily drainage volume is <50 ml, then mobilization with no weight-bearing in an orthesis, 4 weeks systemic antibiotics, after 2 weeks without antibiotics aspiration of the joint, when no bacteria are found reimplantation of a revision TKA (total knee arthroplasty) and with plastic surgery for coverage (gastrognemius flap) if necessary, when bacteria are found again revision with exchange of the spacer.

resultsIn the literature, the success rate for both the one-stage or the two-stage procedure is about 80-95%. In our very nonhomogeneous collective the overall rate of success is about 81%.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseArthroscopyBacterial InfectionsDebridementDevice RemovalDrainageHumansKnee ProsthesisProsthesis-Related InfectionsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23775215
OpenAlexW161871946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.