Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23775191›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2013

The dynamics of engineered resident proteins in the mammalian Golgi complex relies on cisternal maturation.

Riccardo Rizzo, Seetharaman Parashuraman, Peppino Mirabelli, Claudia Puri, John Lucocq, Alberto Luini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Models of Intracellular Transport: Pros and Cons.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Compositional complexity of rods and rings.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Riccardo RizzoInstituto di Biochimica delle Proteine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Richerche, 80131 Naples, Italy. a.luini@ibp.cnr.it
Seetharaman Parashuraman
Peppino Mirabelli
Claudia Puri
John Lucocq
Alberto Luini

Funding

Telethon TGM11CB5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After leaving the endoplasmic reticulum, secretory proteins traverse several membranous transport compartments before reaching their destinations. How they move through the Golgi complex, a major secretory station composed of stacks of membranous cisternae, is a central yet unsettled issue in membrane biology. Two classes of mechanisms have been proposed. One is based on cargo-laden carriers hopping across stable cisternae and the other on "maturing" cisternae that carry cargo forward while progressing through the stack. A key difference between the two concerns the behavior of Golgi-resident proteins. Under stable cisternae models, Golgi residents remain in the same cisterna, whereas, according to cisternal maturation, Golgi residents recycle from distal to proximal cisternae via retrograde carriers in synchrony with cisternal progression. Here, we have engineered Golgi-resident constructs that can be polymerized at will to prevent their recycling via Golgi carriers. Maturation models predict the progress of such polymerized residents through the stack along with cargo, but stable cisternae models do not. The results support the cisternal maturation mechanism.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineGolgi ApparatusHeLa CellsHumansMannosidasesMiceModels, BiologicalProtein Sorting SignalsProtein TransportRatsMannosidasesProtein Sorting Signals

Identifiers

PMID23775191
PMCPMC3691466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.