Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23775141›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2013

A semi-mechanistic red blood cell survival model provides some insight into red blood cell destruction mechanisms.

Julia Korell, Stephen B Duffull

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmacodynamic models of age-structured cell populations.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Julia KorellSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. julia.korell@otago.ac.nz
Stephen B Duffull
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most mathematical models developed for the survival of haematological cell populations, in particular red blood cells (RBCs), follow the principle of parsimony. They focus on the predominant destruction mechanism of age-related cell death (senescence) and do not account for within subject variability in the RBC lifespan. However, assessment of the underlying physiological destruction mechanisms can be of interest in pathological conditions that affect RBC survival, for example sickle cell anaemia or anaemia of chronic kidney disease. We have previously proposed a semi-mechanistic RBC survival model which accounts for four different types of RBC destruction mechanisms. In this work, it is shown that the proposed model in combination with informative RBC survival data is able to provide a deeper insight into RBC destruction mechanisms. The proposed model was applied in a non-linear mixed effect modelling framework to biotin derived RBC survival data available from literature. Three mechanisms were estimable based on the available data of twelve subjects, including random destruction, senescence and destruction due to delayed failure. It was possible to identify three subjects with a decreased RBC survival in the study population. These three subjects all showed differences in the contribution of the estimated destruction mechanisms: an increased random destruction, versus an accelerated senescence, versus a combination of both.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalErythrocyte AgingErythrocytesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23775141
OpenAlexW1997127189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.