Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23773662›Full record

ReviewJournal of fluency disorders2013

Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances.

Ehud Yairi, Nicoline Ambrose

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fluency disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07764419 (Examining the Effectiveness of a Desensitization-Based Structured Intervention Program for Individuals With Stuttering in Job Interviews), which is not on this map. Cited by 180 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07764419 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Examining the Effectiveness of a Desensitization-Based Structured Intervention Program for Individuals With Stuttering in Job Interviews

TypeinterventionalSponsorDİLARA BASERRan2026 to 2027Enrolled36ConditionsStutteringArmsStructured Desensitization-Based Job Interview Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 612 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Clinical Characteristics Associated With Stuttering Persistence: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Short-Term Memory, Inhibition, and Attention in Developmental Stuttering: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Listener Ratings of Stuttering: Evaluating Two Auditory-Perceptual Scales.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ehud YairiUniversity of Illinois, Department of Speech and Hearing Science, 901 6th Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. e-yairi@Illinois.edu
Nicoline Ambrose
Illinois College · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Subtypes and Associated Risk Factors in StutteringR01DC005210 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI AMBROSE, NICOLINE GRINAGER · 2002 to 2013
$4.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005210NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC05210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledEpidemiological advances in stuttering during the current century are reviewed within the perspectives of past knowledge. The review is organized in six sections: (a) onset, (b) incidence, (c) prevalence, (d) developmental paths, (e) genetics and (f) subtypes. It is concluded that: (1) most of the risk for stuttering onset is over by age 5, earlier than has been previously thought, with a male-to-female ratio near onset smaller than what has been thought, (2) there are indications that the lifespan incidence in the general population may be higher than the 5% commonly cited in past work, (3) the average prevalence over the lifespan may be lower than the commonly held 1%, (4) the effects of race, ethnicity, culture, bilingualism, and socioeconomic status on the incidence/prevalence of stuttering remain uncertain, (5) longitudinal, as well as incidence and prevalence studies support high levels of natural recovery from stuttering, (6) advances in biological genetic research have brought within reach the identification of candidate genes that contribute to stuttering in the population at large, (7) subtype-differentiation has attracted growing interest, with most of the accumulated evidence supporting a distinction between persistent and recovered subtypes. EDUCATIONAL

objectivesReaders will be exposed to a summary presentation of the most recent data concerning basic epidemiological factors in stuttering. Most of these factors also pertain to children's risks for experiencing stuttering onset, as well as risks for persistency. The article also aims to increase awareness of the implications of the information to research, and professional preparation that meets the epidemiology of the disorder.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge of OnsetChildFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIncidenceMalePrevalenceRemission, SpontaneousRisk FactorsSex FactorsStuttering

Identifiers

PMID23773662
PMCPMC3687212
OpenAlexW2083526227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.