An antibiotic prescription induces resistance at the individual level more than the group level.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Risk factors for colonization with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
   Article
2. Potential drug interactions with antibacterials in long-term care facilities analyzed by two interaction checkers.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019
   Article
3. The Improving Outcomes of UTI Management in Long-Term Care Project (IOU) Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Uncomplicated Cystitis in Nursing Home Residents.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2018
   Article
4. Optimizing Antibiotic Stewardship in Nursing Homes: A Narrative Review and Recommendations for Improvement.Drugs & aging · 2015
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as