Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23773295›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia research2013

Attenuated psychosis syndrome in DSM-5.

Ming T Tsuang, Jim Van Os, Rajiv Tandon, Deanna M Barch, Juan Bustillo, Wolfgang Gaebel, Raquel E Gur, Stephan Heckers, Dolores Malaspina, Michael J Owen and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Schizophrenia treatment preferences of psychiatrists versus guidelines: A European perspective.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Ming T TsuangCenter for Behavioral Genomics, Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Genomic Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA; Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Harvard Institute of Psychiatric Epidemiology and Genetics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: mtsuang@ucsd.edu.
Jim Van Os
Rajiv Tandon
Deanna M Barch
Juan Bustillo
Wolfgang Gaebel
Raquel E Gur
Stephan Heckers
Dolores Malaspina
Michael J Owen
Susan Schultz
William Carpenter
Cardiff University · GBCreedmoor Psychiatric Center · USHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEKings Health Partners · GBUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVanderbilt University · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

6/9-Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081944 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CADENHEAD, KRISTIN S. · 2008 to 2018
$4.9M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in the treatment of schizophrenia over the past half-century, the illness is frequently associated with a poor outcome. This is principally related to the late identification and intervention in the course of the illness by which time patients have experienced a substantial amount of socio-occupational decline that can be difficult to reverse. The emphasis has therefore shifted to defining psychosis-risk syndromes and evaluating treatments that can prevent transition to psychosis in these ultra-high risk groups. To consider the appropriateness of adding psychosis risk syndrome to our diagnostic nomenclature, the psychotic disorders work group extensively reviewed all available data, consulted a range of experts, and carefully considered the variety of expert and public comments on the topic. It was clear that reliable methods were available to define a syndrome characterized by sub-threshold psychotic symptoms (in severity or duration) and which was associated with a very significant increase in the risk of development of a full-fledged psychotic disorder (schizophrenia spectrum, psychotic mood disorder, and other psychotic disorders) within the next year. At the same time, the majority of individuals with "attenuated psychotic symptoms" had one or more other current psychiatric comorbid conditions (usually mood or anxiety disorders, substance use disorder; Fusar-Poli 2012) and exhibited a range of psychiatric outcomes other than conversion to psychosis (significant proportions either fully recover or develop some other psychiatric disorder, with a minority developing a psychotic disorder). Although the reliability of the diagnosis is well established in academic and research settings, it was found to be less so in community and other clinical settings. Furthermore, the nosological relationship of attenuated psychosis syndrome (APS) to schizotypal personality disorder and other psychiatric conditions was unclear. Further study will hopefully resolve these questions. The work group decided to recommend the inclusion of attenuated psychosis syndrome as a category in the appendix (Section 3) of DSM-5 as a condition for further study.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyHumansRisk FactorsAttenuated psychosis syndromeHigh riskInterventionProdromesSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID23773295
PMCPMC3778120
OpenAlexW2103946644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.