Authorship and contributorship in scholarly journals.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Statistical Competence and Editorial Policies in Biomedical Publications.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026
   Review
2. Authorship Accountability and Transparency: A Standardized Model from the Global Andrology Forum.The world journal of men's health · 2026
   Article
3. Coercion Authorship: Ubiquitous and Preventable.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024
   Article
4. Beyond the Keyboard: Academic Writing in the Era of ChatGPT.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023
   Article
5. Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: a rapid scoping review.Clinical rheumatology · 2022
   Article
6. Authorship Weightage Algorithm for Academic Publications: A New Calculation and ACES Webserver for Determining Expertise.Methods and protocols · 2021
   Article
7. Biologics in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-main advantages and major challenges: A narrative review.Archives of rheumatology · 2021
   Review
8. Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils.Journal of Korean medical science · 2019
   Review
9. Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018
   Review
10. Researchers and editors at the heart of science communication.Journal of Korean medical science · 2014
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as