ReviewJournal of digital imaging2013
Strategies for radiology reporting and communication. Part 1: challenges and heightened expectations.
Review in Journal of digital imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Standardized Reporting Systems on Patient Experience in Radiology.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- American College of Veterinary Radiology and European College of Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging consensus statement on imaging report foundations.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025Article
- Call to Action: Creating Resources for Radiology Technologists to Capture Higher Quality Portable Chest X-rays.Cureus · 2022Article
- Article
- Incidental findings associated with magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Teaching Medical Students Optimal Consulting Skills: The Challenge of Generating Better Referring Physicians.Cureus · 2019Article
- Improving compliance with Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) reporting standards: A serial comparison of 523 labs over seven years.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Radiology reporting-from Hemingway to HAL?Insights into imaging · 2018Review
- Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Creating a Standardized and Objective Methodology.Journal of digital imaging · 2018Review
- The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center.Pediatric radiology · 2017Article
- [Use of magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedic trauma surgery: global needs analysis].Der Unfallchirurg · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.