Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23771808›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2013

Mining and evaluation of new specific molecular targets for the PCR detection of Salmonella spp. genome.

Xiaohan Kong, Zhaoxin Lu, Ligong Zhai, Shulin Yao, Chong Zhang, Fengxia Lv, Xiaomei Bie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay for the rapid detection of Salmonella spp. from food.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2019
    Article
  3. Multiplex PCR assay and lyophilization for detection ofFood science and biotechnology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaohan KongKey Laboratory of Food Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Agriculture of China, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Zhaoxin Lu
Ligong Zhai
Shulin Yao
Chong Zhang
Fengxia Lv
Xiaomei Bie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find new molecular targets for the detection of Salmonella. With the online BLAST Program, we compared homology of genomic sequences and specificity in GenBank among Salmonella serovars and non-Salmonella strains and found 98 Salmonella specific target sequences. We selected 33 target sequences of Gene ID from 3335000 to 3337003 for the specificity evaluation, and finally 8 specific fragments screened out, they are 3334138, 3335583, 3335471, 3335211, 3335068, 3336466, 3336736 and 3336998. Primer SC8 of gene 3335583 and SC9 of gene 3335471 were the best in specificity and sensitivity among these primers. The detection sensitivity of Primer SC9 was 1.23 fg/μl for DNA templates and 720 cfu/ml for whole cells, while primer SC8's was 12.3 fg/μl and 720 cfu/ml, respectively. Salmonella could be detected successfully by the PCR method developed in this study after 8 h enrichment when the milk samples were artificially contaminated by this organism at 7 cfu per 10 ml milk.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialAnimalsBase SequenceDatabases, GeneticDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersFood MicrobiologyGenomicsMilkPolymerase Chain ReactionSalmonellaSalmonella entericaSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, BacterialDNA Primers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.