Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23771800›Full record

Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2013

Phase II study of weekly PM00104 (ZALYPSIS(®)) in patients with pretreated advanced/metastatic endometrial or cervical cancer.

Lainie P Martin, Carolyn Krasner, Teresa Rutledge, Manuel Luque Ibañes, Eva M Fernández-García, Carmen Kahatt, Mariano Siguero Gómez, Scott McMeekin

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. PM00104 (Zalypsis®): a marine derived alkylating agent.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lainie P MartinFox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA. Lainie.Martin@fccc.edu
Carolyn Krasner
Teresa Rutledge
Manuel Luque Ibañes
Eva M Fernández-García
Carmen Kahatt
Mariano Siguero Gómez
Scott McMeekin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This open-label, two-arm, phase II clinical trial evaluated the antitumor activity and safety profile of PM00104 (Zalypsis(®)) administered as a 1-h, weekly, intravenous infusion (days 1, 8 and 15; every 4 weeks) at a dose of 2 mg/m(2) to patients with advanced and/or metastatic endometrial (EC) or cervical cancer (CC) after one previous line of systemic chemotherapy. Twelve patients (median age, 61.5 years) with pretreated EC received a median of 2 treatment cycles (range 1-5) and seven patients (median age, 38 years) with pretreated CC received 2 treatment cycles. None achieved objective tumor response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 5.5 months in EC (median follow-up = 20.1 months); median PFS was 1.5 months, and median OS was 5.6 months in CC (median follow-up = 17.1 months). The most common toxicities reported were mild to moderate asthenia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Despite PM00104 showing mostly mild, predictable, manageable and reversible toxicity, protocol criteria for further recruitment were not met in EC, a futility analysis was done and recruitment was stopped; a low patient recruitment rate together with no evidence of activity in CC resulted in early study closure.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsDisease-Free SurvivalEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTetrahydroisoquinolinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsPM 00104Tetrahydroisoquinolines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.