Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23770185›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2013

Specific kinematics and motor-related neurons for aversive chemotaxis in Drosophila.

Xiaojing J Gao, Christopher J Potter, Daryl M Gohl, Marion Silies, Alexander Y Katsov, Thomas R Clandinin, Liqun Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Response Plasticity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. WalkingeLife · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaojing J GaoHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Christopher J Potter
Daryl M Gohl
Marion Silies
Alexander Y Katsov
Thomas R Clandinin
Liqun Luo

Funding

Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH020016 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Justin L Gardner, Merritt C Maduke · 1997 to 2026
$16.2M
Assembly of the Central Olfactory Networks in DrosophilaR01DC005982 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIQUN LUO · 2003 to 2026
$8.1M
Dissecting the functional anatomy of the visual system: a new way forwardDP1OD003530 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2007 to 2011
$3.9M
Dissecting Neural Circuit Computations in the Peripheral Visual SystemR01EY022638 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2012 to 2021
$3.5M
Identification of the neural circuitry underlying motion vision in DrosophilaF32EY020040 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOHL, DARYL · 2010 to 2013
$161k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS F32 EY020040NEI NIH HHS F32EY020040NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022638NEI NIH HHS R01-EY022638NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005982NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC005982NIH HHS DP1 OD003530NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemotaxis, the ability to direct movements according to chemical cues in the environment, is important for the survival of most organisms. The vinegar fly, Drosophila melanogaster, displays robust olfactory aversion and attraction, but how these behaviors are executed via changes in locomotion remains poorly understood. In particular, it is not clear whether aversion and attraction bidirectionally modulate a shared circuit or recruit distinct circuits for execution.

resultsUsing a quantitative behavioral assay, we determined that both aversive and attractive odorants modulate the initiation and direction of turns but display distinct kinematics. Using genetic tools to perturb these behaviors, we identified specific populations of neurons required for aversion, but not for attraction. Inactivation of these populations of cells affected the completion of aversive turns, but not their initiation. Optogenetic activation of the same populations of cells triggered a locomotion pattern resembling aversive turns. Perturbations in both the ellipsoid body and the ventral nerve cord, two regions involved in motor control, resulted in defects in aversion.

conclusionsAversive chemotaxis in vinegar flies triggers ethologically appropriate kinematics distinct from those of attractive chemotaxis and requires specific motor-related neurons.

Indexed as

CuesAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaChemotaxisDrosophila melanogasterMotor ActivityMotor NeuronsOlfactory Perception

Identifiers

PMID23770185
PMCPMC3762259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.