Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23769868›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2013

Making connections--strategies for single molecule fluorescence biophysics.

Dina Grohmann, Finn Werner, Philip Tinnefeld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. TFE and Spt4/5 open and close the RNA polymerase clamp during the transcription cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The bright future of single-molecule fluorescence imaging.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dina GrohmannPhysikalische und Theoretische Chemie - NanoBioSciences, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hans-Sommer-Strasse 10, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany. d.grohmann@tu-bs.de
Finn Werner
Philip Tinnefeld

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H019332/1Wellcome Trust 096553Wellcome Trust WT096553MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence spectroscopy and fluorescence microscopy carried out on the single molecule level are elegant methods to decipher complex biological systems; it can provide a wealth of information that frequently is obscured in the averaging of ensemble measurements. Fluorescence can be used to localise a molecule, study its binding with interaction partners and ligands, or to follow conformational changes in large multicomponent systems. Efficient labelling of proteins and nucleic acids is very important for any fluorescence method, and equally the development of novel fluorophores has been crucial in making biomolecules amenable to single molecule fluorescence methods. In this paper we review novel coupling strategies that permit site-specific and efficient labelling of proteins. Furthermore, we will discuss progressive single molecule approaches that allow the detection of individual molecules and biomolecular complexes even directly isolated from cellular extracts at much higher and much lower concentrations than has been possible so far.

Indexed as

Photochemical ProcessesFluorescenceLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceSpectrometry, FluorescenceLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23769868
PMCPMC3989056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.