Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23769861›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2013

Animal models for vascular tissue-engineering.

Daniel D Swartz, Stelios T Andreadis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Hemodynamics and Wall Mechanics of Vascular Graft Failure.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel D SwartzDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Amherst, NY 14260-4200, United States; Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14203, United States. Electronic address: swartzda@buffalo.edu.
Stelios T Andreadis
Center for Excellence in Education · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Stem Cells for Vascular Tissue EngineeringR01HL086582 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI ANDREADIS, STELIOS THEOHARIS · 2008 to 2017
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL086582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of rise in cardiovascular disease throughout the world, there is increasing demand for small diameter blood vessels as replacement grafts. The present review focuses on the animal models that have been used to test small-diameter TEVs with emphasis on the attributes of each model. Small animal models are used to test short-term patency and address mechanistic hypotheses; and large, preclinical animal models are employed to test long-term patency, remodeling and function in an environment mimicking human physiology. We also discuss recent clinical trials that employed laboratory fabricated TEVs and showed very promising results. Ultimately, animal models provide a testing platform for optimizing vascular grafts before clinical use in patients without suitable autologous vessels.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisEvaluation Studies as TopicModels, AnimalTissue EngineeringAnimalsBlood VesselsBody SizeClinical Trials as TopicHumansVascular Patency

Identifiers

PMID23769861
PMCPMC3783521
OpenAlexW2011929638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.