Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23769196›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2013

Accuracy of the Heidelberg Spectralis in the alignment between near-infrared image and tomographic scan in a model eye: a multicenter study.

Giulio Barteselli, Dirk-Uwe Bartsch, Francesco Viola, Francesca Mojana, Marco Pellegrini, Kathrin I Hartmann, Eleonora Benatti, Simon Leicht, Roberto Ratiglia, Giovanni Staurenghi and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Polarization Variability in Age-related Macular Degeneration.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Pitfalls in retinal optical coherence tomography imaging].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giulio BarteselliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jacobs Retina Center at Shiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Clinica Oculistica, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Dirk-Uwe BartschDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jacobs Retina Center at Shiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Francesco ViolaClinica Oculistica, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesca MojanaClinica Oculistica, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna, Como, Italy.
Marco PellegriniEye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco", University of Milan, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Kathrin I HartmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Eleonora BenattiClinica Oculistica, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Simon LeichtDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Roberto RatigliaClinica Oculistica, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni StaurenghiEye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco", University of Milan, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Robert N WeinrebDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center at Shiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla California.
William R FreemanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jacobs Retina Center at Shiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: freeman@eyecenter.ucsd.edu.

Funding

Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LINDA M ZANGWILL · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
TREATMENT OF RETINOPATHY ASSOCIATED WITH AIDSR01EY007366 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FREEMAN, WILLIAM R. · 1988 to 2013
$7.6M
Mechanistic-Based Non-Invasive Assessment of Retinal Damage in HAART EraR01EY016323 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BARTSCH, DIRK-UWE G · 2006 to 2020
$5.0M
Crystalline Antiproliferative Drugs for Intraocular DiseasesR01EY018589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FREEMAN, WILLIAM R. · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007366NEI NIH HHS R01EY007366NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016323NEI NIH HHS R01EY016323NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018589NEI NIH HHS R01EY018589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate temporal changes and predictors of accuracy in the alignment between simultaneous near-infrared image and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan on the Heidelberg Spectralis using a model eye.

designLaboratory investigation.

methodsAfter calibrating the device, 6 sites performed weekly testing of the alignment for 12 weeks using a model eye. The maximum error was compared with multiple variables to evaluate predictors of inaccurate alignment. Variables included the number of weekly scanned patients, total number of OCT scans and B-scans performed, room temperature and its variation, and working time of the scanning laser. A 4-week extension study was subsequently performed to analyze short-term changes in the alignment.

resultsThe average maximum error in the alignment was 15 ± 6 μm; the greatest error was 35 μm. The error increased significantly at week 1 (P = .01), specifically after the second imaging study (P < .05); reached a maximum after the eighth patient (P < .001); and then varied randomly over time. Predictors for inaccurate alignment were temperature variation and scans per patient (P < .001). For each 1 unit of increase in temperature variation, the estimated increase in maximum error was 1.26 μm. For the average number of scans per patient, each increase of 1 unit increased the error by 0.34 μm.

conclusionOverall, the accuracy of the Heidelberg Spectralis was excellent. The greatest error happened in the first week after calibration, and specifically after the second imaging study. To improve the accuracy, room temperature should be kept stable and unnecessary scans should be avoided. The alignment of the device does not need to be checked on a regular basis in the clinical setting, but it should be checked after every other patient for more precise research purposes.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCalibrationHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInfrared RaysOphthalmoscopesReproducibility of ResultsRetinaTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID23769196
PMCPMC3748183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.