Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23768422›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2014

Psychological distress, gender and dietary factors in South Asians: a cross-sectional survey.

Mimi Bhattacharyya, Louise Marston, Kate Walters, Gladstone D'Costa, Michael King, Irwin Nazareth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Epidemiological Correlates of Psychological Distress in a Rural Community of South India: A Cross-sectional Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mimi Bhattacharyya1Department of Primary Care and Population Health,University College London,Royal Free Campus,Rowland Hill Street,London NW3 2PF,UK.
Louise Marston1Department of Primary Care and Population Health,University College London,Royal Free Campus,Rowland Hill Street,London NW3 2PF,UK.
Kate Walters1Department of Primary Care and Population Health,University College London,Royal Free Campus,Rowland Hill Street,London NW3 2PF,UK.
Gladstone D'Costa2Voluntary Health Association of Goa,Panaji,Goa,India.
Michael King3Research Department of Mental Health Sciences,University College London,London,UK.
Irwin Nazareth1Department of Primary Care and Population Health,University College London,Royal Free Campus,Rowland Hill Street,London NW3 2PF,UK.
University College London · GBRoland Hill (United Kingdom) · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBVoluntary Health Association of Goa · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePsychological distress, defined as symptoms of depression and anxiety, is an increasingly important public health issue in developing countries. Little is known about the extent to which adverse dietary factors are associated with psychological distress in South Asians. Our aim was to compare the associations of diet and psychological distress in men and women in Goa, India.

designCross-sectional study of consecutive attendees in nine urban and rural general practices in Goa, India in 2004-2005. All participants completed an FFQ on their dietary intake in a typical week. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), a WHO-validated screening instrument.

resultsConsecutive attendees (n 1512; 601 men and 911 women) aged 30 to 75 years participated. Moderate and high scores of psychological distress were detected in significantly more women than men (eighty-eight men v. 264 women, unadjusted OR = 0·39; 95 % CI 0·29, 0·52). Those who ate one or more portions of fish weekly had nearly half the prevalence of distress in both sexes (women, OR = 0·52; 95 % CI 0·29, 0·91; men, OR = 0·50; 95 % CI 0·25, 0·99) and this was independent of age, marital status, education, income, religion and living alone.

conclusionsPsychological distress is significantly lower with fish intake in both sexes. Further longitudinal work is needed to establish temporal relationships. Addressing psychological distress is becoming an increasingly significant public health priority in both high- and low-income countries.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorSeafoodAdultAgedAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionDietDiet SurveysFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID23768422
PMCPMC10282352
OpenAlexW2171626330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.