ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
bioNerDS: exploring bioinformatics' database and software use through literature mining.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supporting workflow reproducibility by linking bioinformatics tools across papers and executable code.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Identifying Genomic Data Sources from Biomedical Literature.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Recognizing software names in biomedical literature using machine learning.Health informatics journal · 2020Article
- Model organism data evolving in support of translational medicine.Lab animal · 2018Review
- U-Index, a dataset and an impact metric for informatics tools and databases.Scientific data · 2018Article
- Article
- A Survey of Bioinformatics Database and Software Usage through Mining the Literature.PloS one · 2016Article
- Resource Disambiguator for the Web: Extracting Biomedical Resources and Their Citations from the Scientific Literature.PloS one · 2016Article
- Ambiguity and variability of database and software names in bioinformatics.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2015Article
- Extracting patterns of database and software usage from the bioinformatics literature.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- rAvis: an R-package for downloading information stored in Proyecto AVIS, a citizen science bird project.PloS one · 2014Article
- The Software Ontology (SWO): a resource for reproducibility in biomedical data analysis, curation and digital preservation.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiology-focused databases and software define bioinformatics and their use is central to computational biology. In such a complex and dynamic field, it is of interest to understand what resources are available, which are used, how much they are used, and for what they are used. While scholarly literature surveys can provide some insights, large-scale computer-based approaches to identify mentions of bioinformatics databases and software from primary literature would automate systematic cataloguing, facilitate the monitoring of usage, and provide the foundations for the recovery of computational methods for analysing biological data, with the long-term aim of identifying best/common practice in different areas of biology.
resultsWe have developed bioNerDS, a named entity recogniser for the recovery of bioinformatics databases and software from primary literature. We identify such entities with an F-measure ranging from 63% to 91% at the mention level and 63-78% at the document level, depending on corpus. Not attaining a higher F-measure is mostly due to high ambiguity in resource naming, which is compounded by the on-going introduction of new resources. To demonstrate the software, we applied bioNerDS to full-text articles from BMC Bioinformatics and Genome Biology. General mention patterns reflect the remit of these journals, highlighting BMC Bioinformatics's emphasis on new tools and Genome Biology's greater emphasis on data analysis. The data also illustrates some shifts in resource usage: for example, the past decade has seen R and the Gene Ontology join BLAST and GenBank as the main components in bioinformatics processing. ABSTRACT: Conclusions We demonstrate the feasibility of automatically identifying resource names on a large-scale from the scientific literature and show that the generated data can be used for exploration of bioinformatics database and software usage. For example, our results help to investigate the rate of change in resource usage and corroborate the suspicion that a vast majority of resources are created, but rarely (if ever) used thereafter. bioNerDS is available at http://bionerds.sourceforge.net/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.