Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23767777›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2013

When to start antiretroviral therapy: the need for an evidence base during early HIV infection.

Jens D Lundgren, Abdel G Babiker, Fred M Gordin, Álvaro H Borges, James D Neaton

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Immediate Antiretroviral Therapy Decreases Mortality Among Patients With High CD4 Counts in China: A Nationwide, Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Combination antiretroviral therapy and cancer risk.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Recent Insights into the HIV/AIDS Pandemic.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2016
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jens D LundgrenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. jdl@cphiv.dk
Abdel G Babiker
Fred M Gordin
Álvaro H Borges
James D Neaton
Rigshospitalet · DKMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBUniversity of Minnesota · USWashington University Medical Center · US

Funding

International Network for Strategic Initiatives in Global HIV Trials (INSIGHT)U01AI068641 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI NEATON, JAMES DENNIS · 2006 to 2010
$120.1M
International Network for Strategic Initiatives in Global HIV Trials (INSIGHT)UM1AI068641 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI NEATON, JAMES DENNIS · 2011 to 2014
$83.5M
Medical Research Council MC_U122886352Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/16NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068641NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrategies for use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) have traditionally focused on providing treatment to persons who stand to benefit immediately from initiating the therapy. There is global consensus that any HIV+ person with CD4 counts less than 350 cells/μl should initiate ART. However, it remains controversial whether ART is indicated in asymptomatic HIV-infected persons with CD4 counts above 350 cells/μl, or whether it is more advisable to defer initiation until the CD4 count has dropped to 350 cells/μl. The question of when the best time is to initiate ART during early HIV infection has always been vigorously debated. The lack of an evidence base from randomized trials, in conjunction with varying degrees of therapeutic aggressiveness and optimism tempered by the risks of drug resistance and side effects, has resulted in divided expert opinion and inconsistencies among treatment guidelines. DISCUSSION: On the basis of recent data showing that early ART initiation reduces heterosexual HIV transmission, some countries are considering adopting a strategy of universal treatment of all HIV+ persons irrespective of their CD4 count and whether ART is of benefit to the individual or not, in order to reduce onward HIV transmission. Since ART has been found to be associated with both short-term and long-term toxicity, defining the benefit:risk ratio is the critical missing link in the discussion on earlier use of ART. For early ART initiation to be justified, this ratio must favor benefit over risk. An unfavorable ratio would argue against using early ART. SUMMARY: There is currently no evidence from randomized controlled trials to suggest that a strategy of initiating ART when the CD4 count is above 350 cells/μl (versus deferring initiation to around 350 cells/μl) results in benefit to the HIV+ person and data from observational studies are inconsistent. Large, clinical endpoint-driven randomized studies to determine the individual health benefits versus risks of earlier ART initiation are sorely needed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveHIV InfectionsHumansAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID23767777
PMCPMC3682886
OpenAlexW2081208367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.