Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23766909›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis international2013

Assessing relapse in multiple sclerosis questionnaire: results of a pilot study.

Amy Perrin Ross, Alona Williamson, Jennifer Smrtka, Tracy Flemming Tracy, Carol Saunders, Constance Easterling, John Niewoehner, Nicole Mutschler

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02258217 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Tolerability of Acthar for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Relapses (TAMS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhioHealthRan2014 to 2016Enrolled30ConditionsRelapsing Remitting Multiple SclerosisArmsActhar
NCT03736902 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Attitudes, Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity in People With Multiple Sclerosis Following a Relapse

TypeobservationalSponsorCity, University of LondonRan2018 to 2019Enrolled15ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsQualitative semi structured interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amy Perrin RossDepartment of Neurosciences, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
Alona Williamson
Jennifer Smrtka
Tracy Flemming Tracy
Carol Saunders
Constance Easterling
John Niewoehner
Nicole Mutschler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is need for a brief but comprehensive objective assessment tool to help clinicians evaluate relapse symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and their impact on daily functioning, as well as response to treatment. The 2-part Assessing Relapse in Multiple Sclerosis (ARMS) questionnaire was developed to achieve these aims. Part 1 consists of 7 questions that evaluate relapse symptoms, impact on activities of daily living (ADL), overall functioning, and response to treatment for previous relapses. Part 2 consists of 7 questions that evaluate treatment response in terms of symptom relief, functioning, and tolerability. The ARMS questionnaire has been evaluated in 103 patients with MS. The most commonly reported relapse symptoms were numbness/tingling (67%), fatigue (58%), and leg/foot weakness (55%). Over half of patients reported that ADL or overall functioning were affected very much (47%) or severely (11%) by relapses. Prescribed treatments for relapses included intravenous and/or oral corticosteroids (87%) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (13%). Nearly half of patients reported that their symptoms were very much (33%) or completely resolved (16%) following treatment. The most commonly reported adverse events were sleep disturbance (45%), mood changes (33%), weight gain (29%), and increased appetite (26%). Systematic assessment of relapses and response to relapse treatment may help clinicians to optimize outcomes for MS patients.

Identifiers

PMID23766909
PMCPMC3677606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.