Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23766818›Full record

ArticleBeilstein journal of organic chemistry2013

Amyloid-β probes: Review of structure-activity and brain-kinetics relationships.

Todd J Eckroat, Abdelrahman S Mayhoub, Sylvie Garneau-Tsodikova

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beilstein journal of organic chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. ACS omega · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preparation of Benzothiazolyl-Decorated Nanoliposomes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Todd J EckroatDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kentucky, 789 South Limestone Street, Lexington, KY, 40536-0596, United States ; Life Sciences Institute and Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Michigan, 210 Washtenaw Ave, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2216, United States.
Abdelrahman S Mayhoub
Sylvie Garneau-Tsodikova
University of Kentucky · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of people suffering from Alzheimer's disease (AD) is expected to increase dramatically in the coming years, placing a huge burden on society. Current treatments for AD leave much to be desired, and numerous research efforts around the globe are focused on developing improved therapeutics. In addition, current diagnostic tools for AD rely largely on subjective cognitive assessment rather than on identification of pathophysiological changes associated with disease onset and progression. These facts have led to numerous efforts to develop chemical probes to detect pathophysiological hallmarks of AD, such as amyloid-β plaques, for diagnosis and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy. This review provides a survey of chemical probes developed to date for AD with emphasis on synthetic methodologies and structure-activity relationships with regards to affinity for target and brain kinetics. Several probes discussed herein show particularly promising results and will be of immense value moving forward in the fight against AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasein vivo detectionnear-infrared fluorescence probesPET/SPECT imagingradioactive probes

Identifiers

PMID23766818
PMCPMC3678428
OpenAlexW2015145881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.