Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23766645›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2013

Engineering of epidermis skin grafts using electrospun nanofibrous gelatin/ polycaprolactone membranes.

Huichuan Duan, Bei Feng, Xiangkai Guo, Jiaming Wang, Li Zhao, Guangdong Zhou, Wei Liu, Yilin Cao, Wen Jie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Bioresorbable scaffold as a dermal substitute.International journal of burns and trauma · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Huichuan DuanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, National Tissue Engineering Center of China, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Bei Feng
Xiangkai Guo
Jiaming Wang
Li Zhao
Guangdong Zhou
Wei Liu
Yilin Cao
Wen Jie Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin engineering provides a new strategy for treating a wide variety of skin defects. In particular, electrospun nanofibrous membranes have been used as carriers for epidermis engineering. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a modified gelatin and polycaprolactone (GT/PCL) electrospun membrane for epidermis engineering. The biocompatibility of the membranes was evaluated by seeding HaCaT cells (human keratinocyte cell line) on the membrane and the mechanical properties of the membranes were determined with and without cells after culture. A cell proliferation assay showing that HaCaT cells attached and proliferated well on the membranes demonstrated that the membranes possess good biocompatibility. Mechanical tests showed that the membranes are strong enough to be handled during transplantation. Further in vivo transplantation studies revealed that epidermises engineered with GT/PCL membranes were able to repair skin defects in the nude mouse. These results demonstrate that GT/PCL electrospun membranes could be suitable scaffolds for skin engineering.

Indexed as

EpidermisMembranes, ArtificialAnimalsCell LineCell ProliferationGelatinHumansMaleMiceMice, NudeNanofibersNanotechnologyPolyestersTissue ScaffoldsWound HealingGelatinMembranes, ArtificialpolycaprolactonePolyesterselectrospun nanofibrous membraneepidermis engineeringgelatinpolycaprolactone

Identifiers

PMID23766645
PMCPMC3678860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.