Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23766138›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Nocturnal non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Fransien M Struik, Yves Lacasse, Roger Goldstein, Huib M Kerstjens, Peter J Wijkstra

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chronic non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Nasal highflow improves ventilation in patients with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Automatic detection of COScientific reports · 2024
    Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Journal Club: Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Stable COPD.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fransien M StruikDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen,Netherlands.
Yves Lacasse
Roger Goldstein
Huib M Kerstjens
Peter J Wijkstra
University Medical Center Groningen · NLInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec · CAUniversity of Groningen · NLWest Park Healthcare Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is effective in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nocturnal non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (nocturnal-NIPPV) has been proposed as an intervention for stable hypercapnic patients with COPD.

objectivesTo assess the effects of nocturnal-NIPPV at home via nasal mask or face mask in people with COPD by using a meta-analysis based on individual patient data (IPD). SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register. We performed the latest search in August 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in people with stable COPD that compared nocturnal-NIPPV at home for at least five hours per night, for at least three consecutive weeks plus standard therapy with standard therapy alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: IPD were collected and two review authors assessed risk of bias independently. MAIN

resultsThis update of the systematic review on nocturnal-NIPPV in COPD (Wijkstra 2002), has led to the inclusion of three new studies, leading to seven included studies on 245 people. We obtained IPD for all participants in all included studies. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of all outcomes included zero. These included partial pressure of CO2 and O2 in arterial blood, six-minute walking distance (6MWD), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and sleep efficiency. The mean effect on 6MWD was small at 27.7 m and not statistically significant. Given the width of the 95% CI (-28.1 to 66.3 m), the real effect of NIPPV on 6MWD is uncertain and we cannot exclude an effect that is clinically significant (considering that the minimal clinically difference on 6MWD is around 26 m). AUTHORS'

conclusionsNocturnal-NIPPV at home for at least three months in hypercapnic patients with stable COPD had no consistent clinically or statistically significant effect on gas exchange, exercise tolerance, HRQoL, lung function, respiratory muscle strength or sleep efficiency. Meta-analysis of the two new long-term studies did not show significant improvements in blood gases, HRQoL or lung function after 12 months of NIPPV. However, the small sample sizes of these studies preclude a definite conclusion regarding the effects of NIPPV in COPD.

Indexed as

DiaphragmHumansHypercapniaPartial PressurePositive-Pressure RespirationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePulmonary Gas ExchangeQuality of LifeSleepTime FactorsWalking

Identifiers

PMID23766138
PMCPMC6999800
OpenAlexW1828314202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.