Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23766134›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2013

An overview of recent advances in designing orthopedic and craniofacial implants.

Venkata P Mantripragada, Beata Lecka-Czernik, Nabil A Ebraheim, Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biopolymeric Coatings for Local Release of Therapeutics from Biomedical Implants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. TiOJournal of functional biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  16. Silicon Nitride as a Biomedical Material: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Venkata P MantripragadaBiomedical Engineering Program, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, 43614-5807.
Beata Lecka-Czernik
Nabil A Ebraheim
Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya

Funding

Dual release of osteogenic factors to enhance bone regenerationR03DE019508 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI JAYASURIYA, AMBALANGODAGE CHAMPA · 2009 to 2010
$225k
NIDCR NIH HHS DE019508NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE019508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Great deal of research is still going on in the field of orthopedic and craniofacial implant development to resolve various issues being faced by the industry today. Despite several disadvantages of the metallic implants, they continue to be used, primarily because of their superior mechanical properties. In order to minimize the harmful effects of the metallic implants and its by-products, several modifications are being made to these materials, for instance nickel-free stainless steel, cobalt-chromium and titanium alloys are being introduced to eliminate the toxic effects of nickel being released from the alloys, introduce metallic implants with lower modulus, reduce the cost of these alloys by replacing rare elements with less expensive elements etc. New alloys like tantalum, niobium, zirconium, and magnesium are receiving attention given their satisfying mechanical and biological properties. Non-oxide ceramics like silicon nitride and silicon carbide are being currently developed as a promising implant material possessing a combination of properties such as good wear and corrosion resistance, increased ductility, good fracture and creep resistance, and relatively high hardness in comparison to alumina. Polymer/magnesium composites are being developed to improve mechanical properties as well as retain polymer's property of degradation. Recent advances in orthobiologics are proving interesting as well. This paper thus deals with the latest improvements being made to the existing implant materials and includes new materials being introduced in the field of biomaterials.

Indexed as

OrthopedicsProstheses and ImplantsBiocompatible MaterialsFaceHumansProsthesis DesignSkullBiocompatible Materialsceramicscraniofacialimplantsmechanical propertiesmetal alloysorthopedicpolymers

Identifiers

PMID23766134
PMCPMC4854641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.