Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23765878›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists2014

Hox regulation of transcription: more complex(es).

Franck Ladam, Charles G Sagerström

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Overexpression ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Research progress of PBX1 in developmental and regenerative medicine.International journal of medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The regulation of PBXs and their emerging role in cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in microRNA binding sites on theBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. eLife · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Franck LadamDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Charles G Sagerström
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF HINDBRAIN FORMATIONR01NS038183 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Charles G Sagerstrom · 1999 to 2026
$8.3M
Genetic Regulation of Rhombomere FormationR01HD065081 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SAGERSTROM, CHARLES G · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Molecular Analysis of Hindbrain FormationR56NS038183 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SAGERSTROM, CHARLES G · 2007 to 2007
$400k
NICHD NIH HHS HD065081NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065081NINDS NIH HHS NS038183NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038183NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS038183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hox genes encode transcription factors with important roles during embryogenesis and tissue differentiation. Genetic analyses initially demonstrated that interfering with Hox genes has profound effects on the specification of cell identity, suggesting that Hox proteins regulate very specific sets of target genes. However, subsequent biochemical analyses revealed that Hox proteins bind DNA with relatively low affinity and specificity. Furthermore, it became clear that a given Hox protein could activate or repress transcription, depending on the context. A resolution to these paradoxes presented itself with the discovery that Hox proteins do not function in isolation, but interact with other factors in complexes. The first such "cofactors" were members of the Extradenticle/Pbx and Homothorax/Meis/Prep families. However, the list of Hox-interacting proteins has continued to grow, suggesting that Hox complexes contain many more components than initially thought. Additionally, the activities of the various components and the exact mechanisms whereby they modulate the activity of the complex remain puzzling. Here, we review the various proteins known to participate in Hox complexes and discuss their likely functions. We also consider that Hox complexes of different compositions may have different activities and discuss mechanisms whereby Hox complexes may be switched between active and inactive states.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila ProteinsGenes, HomeoboxHomeodomain ProteinsHumansTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticDrosophila Proteinsexd protein, DrosophilaHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription FactorsCBPcofactorextradenticlegene expressionHDAChomothoraxMeisPbxPrep

Identifiers

PMID23765878
PMCPMC3844075
OpenAlexW1886115146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.