Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23765262›Full record

ArticleDemography2013

Does parental consent for birth control affect underage pregnancy rates? The case of Texas.

Sourafel Girma, David Paton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reproductive Health-Care Utilization of Young Adults Insured as Dependents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2018
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Women's experiences seeking publicly funded family planning services in Texas.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sourafel GirmaSchool of Economics, Sir Clive Granger Building, Nottingham University, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK, Sourafel.Girma@nottingham.ac.uk.
David Paton
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous work based on conjectural responses of minors predicted that the 2003 Texas requirement for parental consent for state-funded birth control to minors would lead to a large increase in underage pregnancies. We use state- and county-level data to test this prediction. The latter allow us to compare the impact of parental consent in counties with and without state-funded family planning clinics. We control for characteristics systematically correlated with the presence of state-funded clinics by combining difference-in-difference estimation with propensity score-weighted regressions. The evidence suggests that the parental consent mandate led to a large decrease in attendance at family planning clinics among teens but did not lead to an increase in underage pregnancies.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFinancing, GovernmentHumansLogistic ModelsMinorsParental ConsentPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescencePropensity ScoreSexual BehaviorState Government

Identifiers

PMID23765262
OpenAlexW2004477596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.