ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2013
A standardized nutrition approach for very low birth weight neonates improves outcomes, reduces cost and is not associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis or mortality.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Long-term benefits of exclusive human milk diet in small for gestational age neonates: a systematic review of the literature.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of nutrition therapy on growth, inflammation and metabolism in immature infants: a study protocol of a double-blind randomized controlled trial (ImNuT).BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- Effects of standardized feeding protocol on growth velocity and necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
- The Interaction of Donor Human Milk Availability and Race/Ethnicity on Provision of Mother's Own Milk for Very Low Birth Weight Infants.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2021Article
- Variation in Neonatal Nutrition Practice and Implications: A Survey of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Units.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Differences in attitudes to feeding post repair of Gastroschisis and development of a standardized feeding protocol.BMC pediatrics · 2019Article
- The Association of Nil Per Os (NPO) Days with Necrotizing Enterocolitis.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2018Article
- NEC-zero recommendations from scoping review of evidence to prevent and foster timely recognition of necrotizing enterocolitis.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017Review
- Neonatal medical exposures and characteristics of low birth weight hepatoblastoma cases: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2014Article
- Complications associated with parenteral nutrition in the neonate.Clinics in perinatology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess how a standard practice for nutrition support in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates would impact on their hospital course. STUDY
designThis was a prospective, single center, before vs after comparison of a non-standardized approach to nutrition in VLBW neonates to a standardized approach. Standardization of feeding initiation, feeding volume and caloric advancement, management of feeding aspirates (residuals), use of starter parenteral nutrition (PN), use of breast milk and donor breast milk, initiation and discontinuation of intravenous (IV) intralipids, documentation of protein use, and utilization of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters were performed. Multiple outcome measures were evaluated. Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U-tests and χ(2) tests were used for statistical analysis.
resultSixty-nine infants in the pre-standardization (non-standardized) group were compared with 154 infants in the standardized approach group. Analysis was performed for each group as a whole. Statistically significant improvements were seen in multiple areas for the standardized group including the day of life birth weight was regained (P<0.0005), use of breast milk as the initial feeding (P<0.0001), use of starter PN on admission (P<0.0001), earlier time for initiation of PN (P<0.0001), decreased use of PN overall (P<0.0001), enteral protein use (P<0.0001), earlier time for initiation of IV intralipids (P<0.002), day of life for full enteral feeds (P<0.0005) and first day for initiation of enteral feeds (P<0.0001). Fewer infants born microcephalic at birth remained so at discharge in the standardized group as compared with the pre-standardized group (P<0.02). Similarly, less infants born small for gestational age at birth remained so at discharge in the standardized group as compared with the pre-standardized group (P<0.05). Two cases of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) occurred in the pre-standardization group and one in the standardized group. No coagulase-negative Staphlococcal infections or line infections occurred during the entire study period. Two cases of sepsis occurred in the pre-standardization group, both in infants <750 g. No cases of sepsis occurred in the standardized group. Cost savings were remarkable from decreased PN usage in the standard group.
conclusionImplementation of a standardized approach to nutrition in VLBW infants reduces the use of PN thereby reducing cost, causes a more rapid regain of birth weight, decreases the number of babies that are small for gestational age and microcephalic at discharge, and decreases the time to full enteral feeds. No adverse increases in mortality, sepsis, NEC, coagulase-negative Staphlococcal infections or line infections occurred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23765172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.