Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23765172›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2013

A standardized nutrition approach for very low birth weight neonates improves outcomes, reduces cost and is not associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis or mortality.

T J Butler, L J Szekely, J L Grow

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Effects of standardized feeding protocol on growth velocity and necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  4. The Interaction of Donor Human Milk Availability and Race/Ethnicity on Provision of Mother's Own Milk for Very Low Birth Weight Infants.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T J ButlerDivision of Neonatology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA.
L J Szekely
J L Grow

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess how a standard practice for nutrition support in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates would impact on their hospital course. STUDY

designThis was a prospective, single center, before vs after comparison of a non-standardized approach to nutrition in VLBW neonates to a standardized approach. Standardization of feeding initiation, feeding volume and caloric advancement, management of feeding aspirates (residuals), use of starter parenteral nutrition (PN), use of breast milk and donor breast milk, initiation and discontinuation of intravenous (IV) intralipids, documentation of protein use, and utilization of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters were performed. Multiple outcome measures were evaluated. Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U-tests and χ(2) tests were used for statistical analysis.

resultSixty-nine infants in the pre-standardization (non-standardized) group were compared with 154 infants in the standardized approach group. Analysis was performed for each group as a whole. Statistically significant improvements were seen in multiple areas for the standardized group including the day of life birth weight was regained (P<0.0005), use of breast milk as the initial feeding (P<0.0001), use of starter PN on admission (P<0.0001), earlier time for initiation of PN (P<0.0001), decreased use of PN overall (P<0.0001), enteral protein use (P<0.0001), earlier time for initiation of IV intralipids (P<0.002), day of life for full enteral feeds (P<0.0005) and first day for initiation of enteral feeds (P<0.0001). Fewer infants born microcephalic at birth remained so at discharge in the standardized group as compared with the pre-standardized group (P<0.02). Similarly, less infants born small for gestational age at birth remained so at discharge in the standardized group as compared with the pre-standardized group (P<0.05). Two cases of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) occurred in the pre-standardization group and one in the standardized group. No coagulase-negative Staphlococcal infections or line infections occurred during the entire study period. Two cases of sepsis occurred in the pre-standardization group, both in infants <750 g. No cases of sepsis occurred in the standardized group. Cost savings were remarkable from decreased PN usage in the standard group.

conclusionImplementation of a standardized approach to nutrition in VLBW infants reduces the use of PN thereby reducing cost, causes a more rapid regain of birth weight, decreases the number of babies that are small for gestational age and microcephalic at discharge, and decreases the time to full enteral feeds. No adverse increases in mortality, sepsis, NEC, coagulase-negative Staphlococcal infections or line infections occurred.

Indexed as

Infant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, Very Low Birth WeightCatheterization, Central VenousEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMaleMilk, HumanParenteral NutritionProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID23765172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.