ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2013
Clinical significance of coagulation assays in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biochemical and haemostatic variables associated with metastasis in dogs with carcinoma or sarcoma.The Journal of small animal practice · 2026Article
- Coagulation parameters for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in the early stage: a retrospective study.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Evaluation of serum D-dimer, fibrinogen, and CA19-9 for postoperative monitoring and survival prediction in resectable pancreatic carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2017Article
- Performance status and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are important prognostic factors in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2016Article
- Elevated pretreatment plasma D-dimer levels and platelet counts predict poor prognosis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.OncoTargets and therapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeActivated coagulation and fibrinolytic system in cancer patients is associated with tumor stroma formation and metastasis in different cancer types. The aim of this study is to explore the correlation of blood coagulation tests for various clinicopathologic factors in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA). MATERIAL: A total of 17 MPA patients were enrolled into the study. All the patients were treatment-naïve. Pretreatment blood coagulation tests including prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), D-dimer, fibrinogen levels, and platelet counts were evaluated. Control group comprised 50 age- and sex-matched individuals without history of malignancy and coagulation disorder.
resultsMedian age of diagnosis was 59 years old (range, 35-72). The plasma level of all coagulation factors revealed statistically significant difference between patient and control group (p < 0.01). Anemic patients had associated with higher D-dimer levels (p = 0.001). Similarly, the ones with elevated serum CA19-9 exhibited significantly higher D-dimer values (p = 0.011). For APTT, significant differences were found in both between gender of patients (p = 0.01) and response to chemotherapy (p = 0.01). The patients with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rates had associated with higher INR (p = 0.05). Univariate analysis of survival revealed that the patients with unresponsive to chemotherapy (p = 0.06) and higher INR (p = 0.078) had poor overall outcome.
conclusionSerum D-dimer level is elevated among MPA patients with higher serum CA19-9 and higher INR levels seem to be a poor prognostic factor in MPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.