Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23764623›Full record

ReviewJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2013

Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: where have we been and where are we going?

Jared M Baeten, Jessica E Haberer, Albert Y Liu, Nirupama Sista

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jared M BaetenDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. jbaeten@uw.edu
Jessica E Haberer
Albert Y Liu
Nirupama Sista
Center for Global Health · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

LOC: HIV Prevention Trials NetworkUM1AI068619 · NIAID · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI MYRON Scott COHEN, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe · 2011 to 2026
$779.5M
Optimizing Antiretroviral-Based HIV Prevention for HIV Serodiscordant CouplesR01MH095507 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAETEN, JARED · 2011 to 2020
$6.1M
Real World Adherence to HIV PrEP in Serodiscordant African CouplesR01MH098744 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HABERER, JESSICA ELIZABETH · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Enhancing PrEP in Community Settings (EPIC)R01MH095628 · NIMH · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI LIU, ALBERT YING-HWA · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068619NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095507NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095628NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), in which HIV-uninfected persons with ongoing HIV risk use antiretroviral medications to reduce their risk of acquiring HIV infection, is an efficacious and promising new HIV prevention strategy. The past 2 years have seen significant new advances in knowledge regarding PrEP, including definitive demonstration that PrEP reduces the risk of HIV acquisition, regulatory approval of combination oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) as the first PrEP agent with a label indication for sexual HIV prevention, and the development of normative guidance for clinical prescribing of PrEP. In PrEP clinical trials, HIV protection was strongly correlated with PrEP adherence; therefore, understanding and supporting adherence to PrEP are key to maximizing its public health impact. As would be expected for any new HIV prevention approach, questions remain, including how to motivate uptake of and sustain adherence to PrEP for HIV prevention in high-risk populations, how much use is sufficient to achieve HIV protection, and the potential of "next-generation" PrEP agents to improve this effective prevention strategy. At this important transition point-from demonstration of efficacy in clinical trials to thinking about implementation and effectiveness-this review addresses where we have been and where we are going with PrEP for HIV prevention.

Indexed as

AdenineAdministration, OralAnti-HIV AgentsDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsEmtricitabineHIV InfectionsHumansMedication AdherenceOrganophosphonatesRisk FactorsTenofovirAdenineAnti-HIV AgentsDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsEmtricitabineOrganophosphonatesTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID23764623
PMCPMC3710117
OpenAlexW1999487971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.