Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23764370›Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2013

Delta opioid receptors in brain function and diseases.

Paul Chu Sin Chung, Brigitte L Kieffer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epigenetic mechanisms of HIV and opioid-induced neuropathology: Potential therapies and interventions.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recommended Opioid Receptor Tool Compounds: ComparativeACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pharmacological reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Tryptophan Substitution in CJ-15,208 (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul Chu Sin ChungInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, UMR7104 CNRS/Université de Strasbourg, U964 INSERM, Illkirch, France.
Brigitte L Kieffer
Inserm · FR

Funding

The Role of Striosome Neurons in Mediating Opiod RewardP50DA005010 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FANSELOW, MICHAEL S · 1987 to 2021
$30.7M
Nr4a1 and GPR88 as novel gene targets for alcoholism: mouse genetic approachesU01AA016658 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITE DE STRASBOURG · PI LAURA ADELA HARSAN · 2006 to 2026
$3.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA016658NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence that the delta opioid receptor (DOR) is an attractive target for the treatment of brain disorders has strengthened in recent years. This receptor is broadly expressed in the brain, binds endogenous opioid peptides, and shows as functional profile highly distinct from those of mu and kappa opioid receptors. Our knowledge of DOR function has enormously progressed from in vivo studies using pharmacological tools and genetic approaches. The important role of this receptor in reducing chronic pain has been extensively overviewed; therefore this review focuses on facets of delta receptor activity relevant to psychiatric and other neurological disorders. Beneficial effects of DOR agonists are now well established in the context of emotional responses and mood disorders. DOR activation also regulates drug reward, inhibitory controls and learning processes, but whether delta compounds may represent useful drugs in the treatment of drug abuse remains open. Epileptogenic and locomotor-stimulating effects of delta agonists appear drug-dependent, and the possibility of biased agonism at DOR for these effects is worthwhile further investigations to increase benefit/risk ratio of delta therapies. Neuroprotective effects of DOR activity represent a forthcoming research area. Future developments in DOR research will benefit from in-depth investigations of DOR function at cellular and circuit levels.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain IschemiaEmotionsEpilepsyHumansHypoxiaMotor ActivityOpioid-Related DisordersReceptors, Opioid, deltaRewardReceptors, Opioid, deltaAmyamygdalaCAcaudate putamen nucleusCeAcentral nucleus of the amygdalaCgcingulate cortexconditioned place aversionconditioned place preferencecontinuous accesscortexCPACPPCPuCxdelta opioid receptorDelta opioid receptorDOREEGelectroencephalographyEnkenkephalinFCxfrontal cortexGPCRG protein coupled receptorHipphippocampusHyphypothalamusIAi.c.v.intermittent accessintracerebroventricularintraperitonealintravenousIn vivoi.p.i.v.knockoutKnockoutKONaccnaltrindoleNTInucleus accumbensOBolfactory bulbparaventricular nucleusPathologypers osPharmacologyp.o.PRprogressive ratioPVNretrosplenial cortexRSSAs.c.SCself-administrationspinal cordsubcutaneousThthalamusventral tegmental areaVTA

Identifiers

PMID23764370
PMCPMC3775961
OpenAlexW2060389245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.