Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23764149›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2014

Why is neuroimmunopharmacology crucial for the future of addiction research?

Mark R Hutchinson, Linda R Watkins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Annual Research Review: Neuroimmune network model of depression: a developmental perspective.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Where Is Dopamine and how do Immune Cells See it?: Dopamine-Mediated Immune Cell Function in Health and Disease.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark R HutchinsonDiscipline of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Level 5, Medical School South, Frome Rd, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Electronic address: mark.hutchinson@adelaide.edu.au.
Linda R Watkins
University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Preventing Transition of Acute-to-Chronic Neuropathic Pain: Models, Mechanisms &R01DE021966 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BARTH, DANIEL S., FLESHNER, MONIKA · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
Exploring the Potential of Glia for Regulating Clinically Relevant Opiod ActionsR01DA023132 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WATKINS, LINDA · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
Optoid Analgesics: Modulation of Trigeminal & Spinal Glial ActivationR01DE017782 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WATKINS, LINDA · 2006 to 2010
$1.9M
Immune and Gilia Regulation of Pain & Analgesic ActionsK05DA024044 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WATKINS, LINDA · 2008 to 2012
$616k
NIDA NIH HHS DA023132NIDA NIH HHS DA024044NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA024044NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023132NIDCR NIH HHS DE017782NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017782NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major development in drug addiction research in recent years has been the discovery that immune signaling within the central nervous system contributes significantly to mesolimbic dopamine reward signaling induced by drugs of abuse, and hence is involved in the presentation of reward behaviors. Additionally, in the case of opioids, these hypotheses have advanced through to the discovery of the novel site of opioid action at the innate immune pattern recognition receptor Toll-like receptor 4 as the necessary triggering event that engages this reward facilitating central immune signaling. Thus, the hypothesis of major proinflammatory contributions to drug abuse was born. This review will examine these key discoveries, but also address several key lingering questions of how central immune signaling is able to contribute in this fashion to the pharmacodynamics of drugs of abuse. It is hoped that by combining the collective wisdom of neuroscience, immunology and pharmacology, into Neuroimmunopharmacology, we may more fully understanding the neuronal and immune complexities of how drugs of abuse, such as opioids, create their rewarding and addiction states. Such discoveries will point us in the direction such that one day soon we might successfully intervene to successfully treat drug addiction. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'NIDA 40th Anniversary Issue'.

Indexed as

Allergy and ImmunologyAnimalsBiomedical ResearchHumansNeuropharmacologySubstance-Related DisordersChemokineCytokineGliaInnate immuneLipopolysaccharideLPSTLRToll-like receptor

Identifiers

PMID23764149
PMCPMC3858520
OpenAlexW2015455559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.