Trial reportBMC cancer2013
CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01130025 (Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term (6 Months) Innohep® Treatment Versus Anticoagulation With a Vitamin K Antagonist (Warfarin) for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients / IN 0901 INT
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticoagulation for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Anticoagulation for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Anticoagulation for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Anticoagulation for people with cancer and central venous catheters.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Anticoagulation for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Oral anticoagulation in people with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Parenteral anticoagulation in ambulatory patients with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Fondaparinux vs warfarin for the treatment of unsuspected pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.Drug design, development and therapy · 2016Trial
- Anticoagulation for Cancer Patients in Special Situations: A Narrative Review of Guidelines and Literature.Cancers · 2026Review
- Unmet Needs and Challenges in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Crucial Role of Tinzaparin in Managing Venous Thromboembolism in the Cancer Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring the Emerging Association Between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Quality of life in oncological patients with venous thromboembolic disease.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Review
- Update on the Pharmacological Actions of Enoxaparin in Nonsurgical Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Abelacimab in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: The Right Drug at the Right Time for the Right Purpose. A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Management of Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Anticoagulation and bleeding in the cancer patient.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Enoxaparin versus dalteparin or tinzaparin in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism: The RIETECAT study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- H3K9 trimethylation in active chromatin restricts the usage of functional CTCF sites in SINE B2 repeats.Genes & development · 2022Article
- Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer: A Comprehensive Review from Pathophysiology to Novel Treatment.Biomolecules · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended and commonly used for extended treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), but its superiority over warfarin has been demonstrated in only one randomised study. We report here the rationale, design and a priori analysis plans of Comparison of Acute Treatments in Cancer Haemostasis (CATCH; NCT01130025), a multinational, Phase III, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing tinzaparin with warfarin for extended treatment of CAT. METHODS/
designThe primary objective is to assess the efficacy of tinzaparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer and acute, symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. The secondary objectives are to determine: safety of tinzaparin given over 6 months; clinical and laboratory markers for recurrent VTE and/or major bleeding; 6-month overall mortality; incidence and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome; patient-reported quality of life; and healthcare resource utilisation. Nine hundred patients are randomised to receive tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 6 months or initial tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 5-10 days and dose-adjusted warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) for 6 months. The primary composite outcome is time to recurrent VTE, including incidental VTE and fatal pulmonary embolism. All patients are followed up to 6 months or death, whichever comes sooner. Blinded adjudication will be performed for all reported VTE, bleeding events and causes of death. Efficacy will be analysed using centrally adjudicated results of all patients according to intention-to-treat analysis. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board is reviewing data at regular intervals and an interim analysis is planned after 450 patients have completed the study. DISCUSSION: The results will add significantly to the knowledge of the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of tinzaparin in the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer and thrombosis. Prospective data will emerge on the clinical significance of incidental VTE and risk stratification in patients with CAT. Results on post-thrombotic syndrome, quality of life and healthcare resource utilisation will inform decision makers on how to secure better patient care. If tinzaparin is shown to be more effective than warfarin, CATCH will provide valuable confirmatory data to support the use of the LMWH tinzaparin for extended treatment of CAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.