Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23764005›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2013

CATCH: a randomised clinical trial comparing long-term tinzaparin versus warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.

Agnes Y Y Lee, Rupert Bauersachs, Mette S Janas, Mikala F Jarner, Pieter W Kamphuisen, Guy Meyer, Alok A Khorana, CATCH Investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01130025 (Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01130025 phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term (6 Months) Innohep® Treatment Versus Anticoagulation With a Vitamin K Antagonist (Warfarin) for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients / IN 0901 INT

TypeinterventionalSponsorLEO PharmaRan2010 to 2014Enrolled900ConditionsVenous ThromboembolismArmsWarfarin, Innohep®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anticoagulation for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Anticoagulation for people with cancer and central venous catheters.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Parenteral anticoagulation in ambulatory patients with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Unmet Needs and Challenges in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Quality of life in oncological patients with venous thromboembolic disease.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Anticoagulation and bleeding in the cancer patient.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Agnes Y Y Lee
Rupert Bauersachs
Mette S Janas
Mikala F Jarner
Pieter W Kamphuisen
Guy Meyer
Alok A Khorana
CATCH Investigators
Leo Pharma (Denmark) · DKCleveland Clinic · USKlinikum Darmstadt · DEUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended and commonly used for extended treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), but its superiority over warfarin has been demonstrated in only one randomised study. We report here the rationale, design and a priori analysis plans of Comparison of Acute Treatments in Cancer Haemostasis (CATCH; NCT01130025), a multinational, Phase III, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing tinzaparin with warfarin for extended treatment of CAT. METHODS/

designThe primary objective is to assess the efficacy of tinzaparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer and acute, symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. The secondary objectives are to determine: safety of tinzaparin given over 6 months; clinical and laboratory markers for recurrent VTE and/or major bleeding; 6-month overall mortality; incidence and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome; patient-reported quality of life; and healthcare resource utilisation. Nine hundred patients are randomised to receive tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 6 months or initial tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 5-10 days and dose-adjusted warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) for 6 months. The primary composite outcome is time to recurrent VTE, including incidental VTE and fatal pulmonary embolism. All patients are followed up to 6 months or death, whichever comes sooner. Blinded adjudication will be performed for all reported VTE, bleeding events and causes of death. Efficacy will be analysed using centrally adjudicated results of all patients according to intention-to-treat analysis. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board is reviewing data at regular intervals and an interim analysis is planned after 450 patients have completed the study. DISCUSSION: The results will add significantly to the knowledge of the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of tinzaparin in the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer and thrombosis. Prospective data will emerge on the clinical significance of incidental VTE and risk stratification in patients with CAT. Results on post-thrombotic syndrome, quality of life and healthcare resource utilisation will inform decision makers on how to secure better patient care. If tinzaparin is shown to be more effective than warfarin, CATCH will provide valuable confirmatory data to support the use of the LMWH tinzaparin for extended treatment of CAT.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTinzaparinAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightTinzaparinWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID23764005
PMCPMC3691586
OpenAlexW2061227527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.