ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2013
Predicting complex traits using a diffusion kernel on genetic markers with an application to dairy cattle and wheat data.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical evaluation of the theory and practice of feed-forward neural networks for genomic prediction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Learning sequence-function relationships with scalable, interpretable Gaussian processes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Use of the linear regression method to evaluate population accuracy of predictions from non-linear models.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Genetic Parameter and Hyper-Parameter Estimation Underlie Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Bread Wheat.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Multi-environment analysis enhances genomic prediction accuracy of agronomic traits in sesame.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Sparse kernel models provide optimization of training set design for genomic prediction in multiyear wheat breeding data.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Genomic Prediction Methods Accounting for Nonadditive Genetic Effects.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Haplotype genomic prediction of phenotypic values based on chromosome distance and gene boundaries using low-coverage sequencing in Duroc pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Application of Bayesian networks to the prediction of the AMEn: a new methodology in broiler nutrition.Translational animal science · 2021Article
- An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
- Network and Systems Medicine: Position Paper of the European Collaboration on Science and Technology Action on Open Multiscale Systems Medicine.Network and systems medicine · 2020Review
- Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Quantifying genomic connectedness and prediction accuracy from additive and non-additive gene actions.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
- Non-additive Effects in Genomic Selection.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Maize Using Kernel Models with Genotype × Environment Interaction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Epistasis and covariance: how gene interaction translates into genomic relationship.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2016Article
- A Unified and Comprehensible View of Parametric and Kernel Methods for Genomic Prediction with Application to Rice.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArguably, genotypes and phenotypes may be linked in functional forms that are not well addressed by the linear additive models that are standard in quantitative genetics. Therefore, developing statistical learning models for predicting phenotypic values from all available molecular information that are capable of capturing complex genetic network architectures is of great importance. Bayesian kernel ridge regression is a non-parametric prediction model proposed for this purpose. Its essence is to create a spatial distance-based relationship matrix called a kernel. Although the set of all single nucleotide polymorphism genotype configurations on which a model is built is finite, past research has mainly used a Gaussian kernel.
resultsWe sought to investigate the performance of a diffusion kernel, which was specifically developed to model discrete marker inputs, using Holstein cattle and wheat data. This kernel can be viewed as a discretization of the Gaussian kernel. The predictive ability of the diffusion kernel was similar to that of non-spatial distance-based additive genomic relationship kernels in the Holstein data, but outperformed the latter in the wheat data. However, the difference in performance between the diffusion and Gaussian kernels was negligible.
conclusionsIt is concluded that the ability of a diffusion kernel to capture the total genetic variance is not better than that of a Gaussian kernel, at least for these data. Although the diffusion kernel as a choice of basis function may have potential for use in whole-genome prediction, our results imply that embedding genetic markers into a non-Euclidean metric space has very small impact on prediction. Our results suggest that use of the black box Gaussian kernel is justified, given its connection to the diffusion kernel and its similar predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.