Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23763717›Full record

ReviewThe FEBS journal2013

Tissue-resident mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in skeletal muscle: collaborators or saboteurs?

Robert N Judson, Regan-Heng Zhang, Fabio M A Rossi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The FEBS journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. FAPs orchestrate homeostasis of muscle physiology and pathophysiology.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. DPPIVNature communications · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert N JudsonBiomedical Research Centre, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. rjudson@brc.ubc.ca
Regan-Heng Zhang
Fabio M A Rossi
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR 94019-1CIHR 94219-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the regenerative potential of adult skeletal muscle is maintained by satellite cells, other stem/progenitor cell populations also reside in skeletal muscle. These heterogeneous cellular pools with mesenchymal lineage potentially play important roles in tissue homeostasis, with reciprocal collaborations between these cells and satellite cells appearing critical for effective regeneration. However, in disease settings, these mesenchymal stem/progenitors adopt a more sinister role - likely providing a major source of fibrosis, fatty tissue and extracellular matrix protein deposition in dystrophic tissue. Development of therapies for muscle degeneration therefore requires complete understanding of the multiple cell types involved and their complex interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMuscle DevelopmentRegenerationSatellite Cells, Skeletal Musclefibro/adipogentic progenitorsmesenchymal stem cellsmuscular dystrophymyogenesisregenerative medicinesatellite cellsskeletal musclestem cellstissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID23763717
PMCPMC4880469
OpenAlexW2094629131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.