ArticlePsychophysiology2013
EEG signatures associated with stopping are sensitive to preparation.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- EEG reveals that dextroamphetamine improves cognitive control through multiple processes in healthy participants.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Trial
- Social support, spirituality, and executive functions: An event-related potential (ERP) study of neural mechanisms of cultural protective factors in American Indians (AIs).The American psychologist · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of Proactive Adaptation in a Rewarded Response Inhibition Task: Executive, Motor, or Attentional Effects?Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Does the stop-signal P3 reflect inhibitory control?Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Analysis of Event-Related Potentials of Response Inhibition: The Role of Negative Urgency and Compulsivity.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Lexical inhibition after semantic violations recruits a domain-general inhibitory control mechanism.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- Article
- The slow rate of working memory consolidation from vision is a structural limit.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Reward prospect affects strategic adjustments in stop signal task.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Exploring stop signal reaction time over two sessions of the anticipatory response inhibition task.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Early response competition over the motor cortex underlies proactive control of error correction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Neuronal Activity in the Premotor Cortex of Monkeys Reflects Both Cue Salience and Motivation for Action Generation and Inhibition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Towards real-world generalizability of a circuit for action-stopping.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021Review
- Investigating limits of task prioritization in dual-tasking: evidence from the prioritized processing and the psychological refractory period paradigms.Psychological research · 2021Article
- tDCS over the inferior frontal gyri and visual cortices did not improve response inhibition.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- β-Bursts Reveal the Trial-to-Trial Dynamics of Movement Initiation and Cancellation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Electrophysiological Evidence for Distinct Proactive Control Mechanisms in a Stop-Signal Task: An Individual Differences Approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Inhibition-related differences between tic-free and tic-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from the N2 and P3.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Neural Activities Classification of Human Inhibitory Control Using Hierarchical Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Alcohol affects the P3 component of an adaptive stop signal task ERP.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preparing to stop may "prime" the neural mechanism for stopping and alter brain activity at the time of stopping. Much electroencephalography (EEG) research has studied the N2/P3 complex over frontocentral electrodes during outright stopping. Here, we used differential reward of the stop and go processes in a stop signal task to study the sensitivity of these EEG components to preparation. We found that (a) stopping was faster when it was rewarded; (b) the P3 amplitude was larger for successful versus failed stopping, and this difference was greater when stopping was rewarded over going; (c) the N2 component was observed only on failed stop trials; and (d) there was greater EEG coherence between frontocentral and occipitoparietal electrodes at 12 Hz during the initiation of a go response when stopping was rewarded over going. We propose that frontocentral cortical mechanisms active before and at the time of stopping are sensitive to preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.